Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—Former AU Optronics Executive Convicted in Retrial Is Sentenced to 24 Months in Prison, Ordered to Pay Fine
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: High Court Denies Request to Consider Whether Single Publication Rule Governs Lanham Act False Endorsement Claim
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Florida Attorney General Sues Hitachi over Alleged Optical Disc Drive Price Fixing
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Supreme Court Denies Request to Review Legality of Truck Transmission Maker’s Sales Agreements
    • ANTITRUST—CDCal: Antitrust Claims Fail Against World of Warcraft Developer over Prohibition on Use of Third-Party Add-On Software
    • ANTITRUST—NDIll: Mortgage Holder Can Challenge Alleged Misrepresentation of Mortgage Servicer But Not Under Antitrust Laws
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC Staff Recommends Adoption of Proposed Amendments to Mail or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—WDWash: Number of Text Message May Support TCPA Claim
    • FRANCHISING AND DISTRIBUTION NEWS: Real Estate Office Franchisor Mossy Oak Properties Sues Franchisee and Guarantor
    • INDUSTRY NEWS: Antitrust Litigator Adrienne Pitts Joins Baker & McKenzie
    • PRIVACY—EDMich: Class Certification Denied in Two Putative TCPA Facsimile Advertising Class Actions
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—DHaw: Home Loan Borrowers Failed to State Unfair and Deceptive Practices Claims Against Bank of America
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, TOP STORY—Former AU Optronics Executive Convicted in Retrial Is Sentenced to 24 Months in Prison, Ordered to Pay Fine, (Apr 29, 2013)

    Organizations Mentioned:AU Optronics Corp.

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    A former senior manager in the Desktop Display Business Group of liquid crystal display (LCD) producer AU Optronics Corporation was sentenced today for his role in a conspiracy to fix prices for thin-film transistor-liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) p ...

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    A former senior manager in the Desktop Display Business Group of liquid crystal display (LCD) producer AU Optronics Corporation was sentenced today for his role in a conspiracy to fix prices for thin-film transistor-liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) panels. The executive, Shiu Lung Leung, was sentenced to serve 24 months in prison and to pay a $50,000 criminal fine, the Department of Justice announced (U.S. v. Leung, Criminal No. 09-0110(SI)).

    Leung was found guilty by a jury in the federal district court in San Francisco in December 2012. The guilty verdict came at the end of a three-week retrial, which was precipitated by an earlier mistrial.

    After an eight-week trial, in March 2012, Taiwan-based AU Optronics Corporation and its American subsidiary, AU Optronics Corp. America, were found guilty of conspiring to fix prices. AU Optronics Corporation’s former president and former executive vice president also were found guilty at that time. Two other AU Optronics Corporation employees were found not guilty. A mistrial was declared only with respect to Leung.

    Both Hsuan Bin Chen and Hui Hsiung were sentenced to serve three years in prison and to each pay a $200,000 criminal fine. The defendants convicted in the first trial have appealed their convictions and sentences to the Ninth Circuit.

    "These international price-fixers caused consumers to pay inflated prices for their computer monitors, notebook computers and televisions," said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice Antitrust Division, in announcing the sentence. "Prison sentences for culpable executives, combined with substantial fines against corporate wrongdoers, are the most effective deterrents for protecting consumers from this kind of illegal cartel behavior."

    MainStory: TopStory Antitrust AntitrustDivisionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use