Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—11th Cir.: No duty for pharmaceutical company to provide medication guide to patient
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • FALSE CLAIMS ACT—E.D. Pa.: Workplace harassment termination was not a pretext for retaliation
    • HEALTH CARE EMPLOYMENT ISSUES—D. Md.: Religious discrimination claims brought by nurse against Adventist hospital dismissed
    • LABELING (FOOD, DRUGS & MEDICAL DEVICES)—S.D. Calif.: Common questions and factors found to predominate in granting class certification over biscuits
    • STARK SELF-REFERRAL LAW—NOTICES: Physician-owned hospital granted exception, facility can expand
    • STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES: Now is the time for Biden Administration to address drivers of health
    • SUPREME COURT NEWS—Medicaid work requirements case on hold
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    Health Law Daily Wrap Up, SUPREME COURT NEWS—Medicaid work requirements case on hold, (Mar 11, 2021)

    By WK Editorial Staff

    The Supreme Court on Thursday called off an oral argument that had been scheduled for late March on the legality of some states’ efforts to impose work requirements on Medicaid recipients, which had been approved under former President Donald ...

    By WK Editorial Staff

    The Supreme Court on Thursday called off an oral argument that had been scheduled for late March on the legality of some states’ efforts to impose work requirements on Medicaid recipients, which had been approved under former President Donald Trump.

    In a one-line docket entry, the Supreme Court pulled the consolidated cases Cochran v. Gresham and Arkansas v. Gresham from its March hearing calendar, which it had previously granted a petition earlier (see Recent petitions and cases pending High Court review, January 13, 2021).

    President Joe Biden's Justice Department had requested that Supreme Court vacate the two lower court decisions while the administration began the process of unwinding the Trump-era rule.

    IndustryNews: NewsStory SupremeCtNews CMSNews MedicaidNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use