Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—E.D. Tex.: $340M was sufficient disgorgement for attempted monopolization of safety syringes
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: Ads for vegan mayonnaise alternative alleged to deceive consumers
    • ADVERTISING—D.N.J.: Bayer may be liable for “bloated” probiotics claims
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: Payment processor’s false ad claims dropped for lack of particularity
    • AGENCY NEWS: ACCC Chairman promotes economic reforms for Australian competition policy
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: AAI urges FTC to carefully scrutinize CVS co-pay policy
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Five banks to pay $4.3 billion in global settlement for attempted forex manipulation
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. La.: Dentist’s claims against state board for license revocation fail
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. Mo.: Former bank affiliate employee could not sue for tying arrangement targeting customer
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—W.D.N.C.: Franchisees’ claims against franchisor subject to arbitration
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: BakerHostetler adds Melinda McLellan to privacy practice
    • PRIVACY—9th Cir.: Sirius XM Radio arbitration provision deemed unenforceable
    • RICO—D. Mass.: Neurontin class attorneys awarded 28% of settlement fund
    • SUPREME COURT DOCKET: Recent decisions, cases, and petitions pending High Court review
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, SUPREME COURT DOCKET: Recent decisions, cases, and petitions pending High Court review, (Nov 12, 2014)

    This Antitrust Law Daily feature presents a chart highlighting the decisions, arguments, briefs, and petitions on antitrust and trade regulation issues before the October 2014 Term of the U.S. Supreme Court.

    To date, there are six antitrust and trade ...

    This Antitrust Law Daily feature presents a chart highlighting the decisions, arguments, briefs, and petitions on antitrust and trade regulation issues before the October 2014 Term of the U.S. Supreme Court.

    To date, there are six antitrust and trade regulation cases docketed for the October 2014 term and the Court has agreed to hear three of them, relating to antitrust. Seven other cases, involving acquisitions and mergers, advertising, antitrust, consumer protection, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act were denied certiorari.

    On November 3, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia declined to review a decision in Kolon Industries Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., rejecting claims that DuPont engaged in monopolization or attempted monopolization of the U.S. para-aramid market with its “Kevlar” fiber through long-term, exclusive supply agreements. The petition for certiorari asked whether, under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 455(b), a federal judge is relieved of his mandatory statutory duty of self-disqualification simply because neither party filed a timely motion to disqualify the judge.

    For details about this and other petitions and cases pending before the Supreme Court, please consult the chart of antitrust and trade regulation cases awaiting decision in the 2014 term. Issued opinions, granted petitions, and pending petitions are listed separately, along with a summary of the questions presented and the current status of the case.

    News: Advertising AcquisitionsMergers Antitrust ConsumerProtection RICO StateUnfairTradePractices

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use