Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: Paper companies get U.S. approval for merger on last day of busy 2014
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: Apple accused of falsely representing iPhone, iPad storage capacity
    • ADVERTISING—D. Md.: Lanham Act, antitrust counterclaims against payment processor dismissed
    • ADVERTISING—D. Vt.: Cookie cutter maker dodges half-baked preliminary injunction request
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: Activity tracker false ad claims lose steam
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC Director Feinstein lists 10 “competition happenings” for 2014
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Facebook charged with eliminating competition for virtual currency services
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. La.: Settlement of indirect purchasers’ claims against pool product makers gets preliminary approval
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC amends Energy Labeling Rule
    • SUPREME COURT DOCKET: Recent decisions, cases, and petitions pending High Court review
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, SUPREME COURT DOCKET: Recent decisions, cases, and petitions pending High Court review, (Dec 31, 2014)

    This Antitrust Law Daily feature presents a chart highlighting the decisions, arguments, briefs, and petitions on antitrust and trade regulation issues before the October 2014 Term of the U.S. Supreme Court.

    To date, there are 12 antitrust and trade r ...

    This Antitrust Law Daily feature presents a chart highlighting the decisions, arguments, briefs, and petitions on antitrust and trade regulation issues before the October 2014 Term of the U.S. Supreme Court.

    To date, there are 12 antitrust and trade regulation cases docketed for the October 2014 term and the Court has agreed to hear three of them, relating to antitrust. Eight other cases—involving acquisitions and mergers, advertising, antitrust, consumer protection, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act—were denied certiorari.

    There is one new petition for review listed in the Docket. In Straw v. Kloecker, an attorney is seeking review of a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago that found the attorney’s civil RICO claim against opposing counsel frivolous. The Petitioner asks in part: (1) whether, as a matter of law under the civil provisions of the RICO Act, a law firm may demand from a disabled person, using threats, the private health information of the disabled person including access to the disabled person’s private Medicare claims database information, with the express purpose of giving this health information to a newspaper publisher defamation defendant; and (2) whether civil RICO’s enterprise and racketeering requirements were met when defendants and their client worked together to demand the private health information, the threat letter was sent by U.S. Mail and email, and the letter indicated that the newspaper would keep and use the health information indefinitely, with no Privacy Act notice or other guarantee of privacy of the information.

    For details about this and other petitions and cases pending before the Supreme Court, please consult the chart of antitrust and trade regulation cases awaiting decision in the 2014 term. Issued opinions, granted petitions, and pending petitions are listed separately, along with a summary of the questions presented and the current status of each case.

    News: Antitrust AcquisitionsMergers Advertising ConsumerProtection RICO StateUnfairTradePractices

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use