Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • LABOR—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES—4th Cir.: Firearms instructor not ‘managerial employee’ exempt from protections of NLRA against retaliation
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—C.D. Cal.: Deaf instructor, granted service dog request after threatening lawsuit, partially advances claims
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Discrimination trainings can trigger hostile work environment, says Second Circuit
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Make-whole or make-believe: NLRB ‘foreseeable‘ damages creates circuit split
    • IMMIGRATION NEWS—Interim final rule reducing farmworker wages strongly opposed by state attorneys general
    • LABOR NEWS—Arbitrator rules in favor of journalists’ union in dispute over employer’s unilateral introduction of AI tools
    • LABOR—ARBITRATION—6th Cir.: Company must comply with arbitration award despite not being named in caption
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Product safety head fired after warning of humanoid robots’ ability to crush human skulls files suit
    • OSHA NEWS—Fresh-cut vegetable processing company subject to proposed penalties of over $1.1M
    • PROCEDURE—D.D.C.: Former Amazon delivery driver cannot challenge EEOC memo closing disparate impact claims
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—3d Cir.: Former personal lawyer for Trump is not lawful Acting U.S. Attorney
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—E.D. Ark.: State employee, fired after Charlie Kirk post, denied reinstatement while retaliation claim proceeds
    • STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES—Top labor and employment developments for November 2025
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES—Top labor and employment developments for November 2025, (Dec 2, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:U.S. Department of Labor

    By Ronald Miller, J.D.

    In case you missed the in-depth coverage of Labor & Employment Law Daily during November, here’s a recap of some key developments in the L&E community.

    Highlights include:

    • In the Supreme Court: The High Court, on November 3, heard oral argument ...

    By Ronald Miller, J.D.

    In case you missed the in-depth coverage of Labor & Employment Law Daily during November, here’s a recap of some key developments in the L&E community.

    Highlights include:

    • In the Supreme Court: The High Court, on November 3, heard oral argument in Hencely v. Flour Corp., a case concerned with whether the Federal Tort Claims Act’s combatant-activities exception applies to preempt a state tort claim brought against a military contractor based on the conduct of one of the contractor’s employees—a suicide bomber. On November 5, the AFL-CIO and the Office and Professional Employees (OPEIU), filed a motion to intervene with the Supreme Court in Space Exploration Technologies Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, to defend the NLRB’s authority and to protect workers’ ability to seek justice for labor law violations with the agency.

    • Federal courts of appeals: The Second Circuit found that the lower court’s attorneys’ fees reduction in a Vermont employment case improperly relied on proportionality. The Fifth and Sixth Circuits held that the NLRB lacks authority to award Thryv remedies.

    • Also of note: In a Florida case, a transgender police officer, fired after a misgendering complaint, moves ahead with some claims. A Massachusetts court declined to issue a TRO against dismantlement of the Justice Department’s CRS, established under the Johnson administration.

    • Agency News. The U.S. Department of Labor announced the Senate confirmation of seven senior leaders appointed by President Trump. DHS published a proposed rule regarding use of biometrics in immigration.

    MainStory: SupremeCourtNews Procedure Safety PublicEmployees Layoffs RemediesDamages AttorneysFees Arbitration Discrimination RaceDiscrimination SexDiscrimination NationalOrigin DisabilityDiscrimination EmployeeLeave Labor UnionsMembers UnfairLaborPractices Covid19 IndividualRights AgencyNews Immigration

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use