Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • PUBLICITY RIGHTS—2nd Cir.: Well-known broadcaster’s claims are stymied by Copyright Act preemption
    • COPYRIGHT—S.D.N.Y.: Lace designer’s infringement claims against Saks, Badgley Mischka dismissed
    • PATENT—5th Cir.: Inventor group and patent holders lacked standing to challenge PTAB’s discretionary institution decisions
    • PATENT—PTAB: USPTO Director imposes heavy sanctions for abuse of IPR process
    • STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES: Top intellectual property law developments for September 2022
    • TRADEMARK—D.N.J.: Democratic Party of NJ gets another try at pleading impersonation claims
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES: Top intellectual property law developments for September 2022, (Oct 5, 2022)

    By Thomas Long, J.D.

    In case you missed the in-depth intellectual property law coverage in the September 2022 issues of IP Law Daily, here are highlights of the month’s most notable developments.

    Among the most important and interesting court decisions in the IP fi ...

    By Thomas Long, J.D.

    In case you missed the in-depth intellectual property law coverage in the September 2022 issues of IP Law Daily, here are highlights of the month’s most notable developments.

    Among the most important and interesting court decisions in the IP field last month, district courts in New York and Connecticut wrestled with various aspects of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, including the Section 1201 safe harbor and the scope of Section 512(f)’s prohibition against misstatements in takedown requests. In patent law, the Federal Circuit weighed in again on the contentious issue of venue in the Western District of Texas, holding that Austin residences of an infringement defendant’s remote workers could satisfy the patent venue statute. In trademark law, in a trade dress dispute over off-road vehicles, the Sixth Circuit provided guidance on the applicability of the “safe distance rule” regarding injunctive relief. Those and other top developments in IP law from last month are discussed in a Strategic Perspectives article available here.

    MainStory: Copyright Patent TechnologyInternet Trademark TradeSecrets

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use