Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—D. Ariz.: Claims that utility’s pricing plans penalize solar energy customers, exclude competition proceed
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: EC approves acquisition of Genworth LPI by AXA
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: FTC economists present gasoline market merger simulation model
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: Marketer brings class heightened ascertainability argument to High Court
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Tex.: Competitors barred from misrepresenting associations with ADT
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: ACCC Chairman discusses regulation of monopoly infrastructure in Australia
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Aetna, United Healthcare allegedly used group boycott to control ambulatory surgical center market
    • ANTITRUST—Cal. App.: Antitrust, unfair competition claims against health care providers not subject to arbitration
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—D. N.J.: Super 8 sleeps easier after receiving default judgment award
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Hausfeld to open competition claims office in Berlin
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES NEWS: High Court asked to review constitutionality of Federal Arbitration Act
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES NEWS: High Court asked to review constitutionality of Federal Arbitration Act, (Oct 29, 2015)

    Organizations Mentioned:Cellco Partnership | Verizon Wireless

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    A Verizon Wireless customer is asking the Supreme Court to review a decision by U.S. Court of Appeals in New York City, finding that his various constitutional challenges to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) were meritless and staying the consumer fr ...

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    A Verizon Wireless customer is asking the Supreme Court to review a decision by U.S. Court of Appeals in New York City, finding that his various constitutional challenges to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) were meritless and staying the consumer fraud action after arbitration was compelled by the trial court (Katz v. Cellco Partnership, Dkt. 15-542).

    The customer sued Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless, on behalf of New York-area Verizon wireless telephone subscribers, asserting contract and consumer fraud claims under New York state law. The consumer fraud claims were based on administrative charges that were allegedly misrepresented as “government related” costs. The customer’s contract with Verizon contained an arbitration clause that invoked the FAA and required the arbitration of disputes. The appellate court affirmed the district court’s decision to deny Katz’s motion for partial summary judgment and grant Verizon’s motion to compel arbitration. However, the court determined that the FAA requires a stay of proceedings when all claims are referred to arbitration and a stay is requested. The consumer’s principal argument—that application of the FAA to compel arbitration of his state law claims violates Article III separation of powers principles and constitutes an impermissible rule of decision—was rejected as meritless.

    The petition for review asks: (1) whether the application of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) to state-law private rights brought within the jurisdiction of the federal courts violates Article III of the United States Constitution; and (2) whether Congress’ adoption of the alternative scheme of adjudication under the FAA combined with the federal courts’ enforcement of the statute as mandated by Congress constitutes “state action.”

    Attorneys: William R. Weinstein for Cellco Partnership.

    Companies: Cellco Partnership

    News: StateUnfairTradePractices

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use