Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—EDMich: Indirect Purchasers’ Claims Proceed in Automotive Wire Harness Price Fixing Case
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: Ohlhausen Discusses Challenges Facing Online Behavioral Advertising and Self-Regulation
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Direct Purchasers Allege Anticompetitive Agreement to Suppress Competition to Niacin Drug
    • ANTITRUST—MDGa: Agreed Order Halts Further Integration of Georgia Hospitals Pending Completion of FTC Administrative Action
    • ANTITRUST—SDOhio: Integrator of Third-Party Applications Fails to State Antitrust Claims Against Provider of Dealer Management System
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC Brings Charges Against Timeshare Resale Operations, Announces Multinational Campaign Against Timeshare Scams
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—DMass: Injunction Barring Establishment of Additional Automobile Dealership Denied
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—DNJ: Time Warner Cable Subscriber Could Not State Claims for Failure to Provide Sports Programming
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—SDCal: Supplement Purchaser’s Claims Not Stayed, Dismissed in Deference to FDA Authority
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—DNJ: Time Warner Cable Subscriber Could Not State Claims for Failure to Provide Sports Programming, (Jun 7, 2013)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Chronakis Siachos & Kaplan, LLC | Wolff & Samson PC
    Organizations Mentioned:Time Warner Cable | Time Warner Cable Inc. | Wolff & Samson

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    A cable subscriber could not state New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) claims against Time Warner Cable Inc. (TWC) for failing to provide certain sports programming, according to the federal district court in Newark, New Jersey (Hoffman v. Time Warne ...

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    A cable subscriber could not state New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) claims against Time Warner Cable Inc. (TWC) for failing to provide certain sports programming, according to the federal district court in Newark, New Jersey (Hoffman v. Time Warner Cable Inc., June 6, 2013, Debevoise, D.).

    The subscriber alleged that he decided to subscribe to TWC based on representations that he would receive two regional sports networks. TWC’s right to carry sports programming expired and was not renewed until 49 days later. In the CFA claims, the subscriber alleged that he had no alterative or remedy available and that he suffered an ascertainable loss in the form of payment for services that were promised by not delivered.

    Because the subscriber could not show that TWC promised anything to him regarding the sports programming, the court dismissed the CFA claim. The subscriber was required to show unlawful conduct by TWC and an ascertainable loss that was caused by the unlawful conduct. CFA claims are subject to the heightened pleading standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b), which required the subscriber to state the date, time, and place of the alleged fraud, who made the misrepresentations, and the general content of the misrepresentation. First, the court noted that the claims were lacking in facts and merely recited the elements of the claim and conclusory statements. The court also held that the subscriber’s claims for lack of particularity. There was no evidence concerning who made the alleged representations, the nature of the communications, or the time or date of the communications. The subscriber also failed to present any details to support the unlawful omissions claims.

    The subscriber also failed to state a breach of contract or unjust enrichment claim, according to the court.

    The case is No. 12-00978 (ES).

    Attorneys: Philip C. Chronakis (Chronakis Siachos & Kaplan, LLC) for Harold M. Hoffman. William E. Goydan (Wolff & Samson PC) for Time Warner Cable Inc.

    Companies: Time Warner Cable Inc.

    Cases: StateUnfairTradePractices NewJerseyNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use