Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—FedCir: Tote Towel Inventor Can Pursue False Advertising, Deceptive Acts, and Unfair Competition Claims Against Bed Bath & Beyond
    • ADVERTISING—DSD: CAN-SPAM Completely Preempted State Law Spam Email Claims
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Filed Rate Doctrine, Indirect Purchaser Standing Issues Raised in Supreme Court Petition
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Supreme Court Asked to Consider Class Action Fairness Act Mass Action Jurisdiction
    • ANTITRUST—EDPenn: Complaint Alleges Gypsum Board Manufacturers Engaged in Price Fixing Conspiracy
    • ANTITRUST—NDCal: Alleged Boycott, Refusal to Deal with “Patent Troll” Was Not Unlawful
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC Goes After Phony Debt Relief Services
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC, States Challenge Alleged Pyramid Scheme
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—DMd: Defenses to Claim That Rent-A-Wreck Franchise Exclusivity Provision Violated California Unfair Competition Law Are “Premature”
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Cord Blood Bank Settles FTC’s Data Security Failure Claims
    • RICO—11thCir.: Florida District Court is Proper Venue for Bahamas Real Estate RICO Claim, Despite Forum Selection Clause
    • RICO—EDMich: Oil Company Investors Fail to State RICO Claim over Alleged Four-Decade Failure to Pay Return on Investment
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—DConn: Insurance Company Not Liable For Cancelling Policy
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—DConn: Insurance Company Not Liable For Cancelling Policy , (Jan 28, 2013)

    Organizations Mentioned:AIG Casualty Company | American International Group | Whitman Breed Abbott & Morgan, LLC

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    Insurance policy holders could not state Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA) claims against AIG Casualty Company for allegedly deceptive acts related to the cancellation of their policy, the federal district court in Hartford has held (Lee ...

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    Insurance policy holders could not state Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA) claims against AIG Casualty Company for allegedly deceptive acts related to the cancellation of their policy, the federal district court in Hartford has held (Lee v. AIG Casualty Company, January 24, 2013, Squatrito, D.).

    One day after AIG cancelled their automobile policy for non-payment of a premium, the policy holders were involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in claims against the insured. The policy holders were not home when AIG sent the cancellation notice. In its UTPA claim, the insured argued that AIG violated the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act (UIPA) and engaged in unfair and deceptive acts.

    The policy holders could not show that AIG violated the UIPA by allegedly misrepresenting the insurance policy in the cancellation notice, according to the court. The UIPA makes it illegal to make, issue, or circulate a statement that misrepresents the benefits, advantages, conditions, or terms of any insurance policy. The policy holders could not show that the notice of cancellation was false or that AIG knew or should have known that it made a false representation. Although it was untimely, the cancellation was valid and did not assert any false facts.

    The court also found that the policy holders failed to state any independent claims under the UTPA. To state a UTPA claim, the policy holder needed to show that the practice was unfair. A practice is unfair if it offends public policy or is immoral, unethical, oppressive, or unscrupulous. Because the policy holders could not show that AIG engaged in any unfair or deceptive practices, the court dismissed the claims.

    The case is No. 3:08CV01897.

    Attorneys: Gerard N. Saggese, III (Whitman, Breed, Abbott & Morgan) for Thomas Lee. Michele C. Camerota (Nuzzo & Roberts) for AIG Casualty Company.

    Companies: AIG Casualty Company

    Cases: StateUnfairTradePractices ConnecticutNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use