Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • ANTITRUST—D. Colo.: Justice Department annot raise objections in meat processing wage suppression settlement final fairness hearing
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: AAI inducts ‘Hall of Fame’ recipient at annual private enforcement conference
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Apple seeks summary judgment in iCloud antitrust suit on timeliness grounds
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • RICO—9th Cir.: Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of sweeping civil RICO suit against state, county, and private defendants as time-barred
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Cal. App.: Uber loses appeal about interpreting arbitration clause with purported class action waiver
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • WORTH NOTING: Other Antitrust and Trade Regulation developments
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Cal. App.: Uber loses appeal about interpreting arbitration clause with purported class action waiver, (Nov 6, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher | Leventhal Stanley & Taylor
    Organizations Mentioned:Uber Technologies, Inc.

    By Justin Marcus Smith, J.D.

    “Uber cannot evade consumer protection laws just because its allegedly deceptive scheme is complicated.”

    A trial court properly concluded, in denying an Uber Technologies, Inc. (Uber) motion to compel arbitration, that consumers who sued ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use