Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • LABOR—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES—NLRB: Casino must show surveillance video to union to process grievance
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—E.D. Okla.: Jury to decide if glass company violated ADA when it fired employee after extended leave
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—Wash. App.: Discrimination action dismissed as a matter of law for denying obesity treatment reversed
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—N.D. Ill.: Nursing mother’s sex discrimination, retaliation claims fail to survive summary judgment
    • EEOC NEWS—Employers on the hook for $1.3M for religious, race discrimination
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—DOL independent contractor rule proposal signals major shift in worker classification standards
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Federal government intervenes in case seeking to invalidate Colorado AI law
    • HOUSE NEWS—Reps. Scott and Omar seek information to assess impact of DOL staff reductions and office closures
    • LABOR NEWS—Drivers in California become first group to organize and win contract at Flowers Foods
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—Fed. Cir.: VA whistleblower properly removed for separately creating hostile environment
    • STATE LEGISLATION—TENNESSEE—New law prohibits employers from requiring, requesting, or enforcing noncompete agreements for workers earning less than $70K
    • SURVEYS—AI and regulatory complexity reshape employer priorities, Littler finds
    • TORT CLAIMS—11th Cir.: Former Alpine Security CEO’s liability for trade secret misappropriation affirmed on appeal
    • VITAL BRIEFING—Trump threatens to raise tariffs on European autos
    • WORTH NOTING—Federal appeals court cases of note
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, STATE LEGISLATION—TENNESSEE—New law prohibits employers from requiring, requesting, or enforcing noncompete agreements for workers earning less than $70K, (May 8, 2026)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    The law, which also provides courts with presumptively reasonable time restraints for enforcement of restrictive covenants, was signed by Governor Lee yesterday.

    The Tennessee legislature passed, and yesterday Governor Bill Lee signed, HB1034/SB0995, ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    The law, which also provides courts with presumptively reasonable time restraints for enforcement of restrictive covenants, was signed by Governor Lee yesterday.

    The Tennessee legislature passed, and yesterday Governor Bill Lee signed, HB1034/SB0995, a bill that prohibits employers from requiring, requesting, or enforcing noncompete agreements for employees earning less than $70,000 annually. For hourly employees, the annualized compensation can be calculated based on 40 hours per week and 52 weeks per year. A noncompete agreement executed in violation of the prohibition is void and unenforceable as a matter of law.

    Rebuttable presumptions regarding time periods. The act also includes a provision regarding the reasonableness of time provisions in restrictive covenants. A court “shall presume to be reasonable in time a restraint sought to be enforced against a former employee or independent contractor” that is two years or less in duration, measured from the termination date, and that is not associated with the sale or ownership of all or a material part of the assets of a business, professional practice, or other commercial enterprise; the shares of a corporation; a partnership interest; a membership interest in a limited liability company; or any other equity interest or right to receive profits in a business, professional practice, or other commercial enterprise.

    Other presumptive time periods apply to current or former distributors, dealers, franchisees, lessees of real or personal property, or licensees of a trademark, trade dress, or service mark (three years or less), as well as to the owner or seller in a sale (five years or less or the period of time during which payments are made).

    The act takes effect July 1, 2026.

    News: StateLegislation ContractClaims Procedure CoverageLiability GCNNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use