Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—D. Md.: States challenging layoffs of probationary federal employees granted preliminary injunctive relief
    • AGENCY NEWS—Large scale HHS firings begin, members of Congress demand answers
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—S.D. Ill.: Fired 72-year-old lawyer who allegedly slept during Zoom hearing gets lawsuit tossed
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—7th Cir.: Nondisabled officer entitled to back pay as remedy for sheriff’s ADA violation
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—EEOC & DOJ new guidance on DEI-related discrimination: What does it mean for employers?
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—New Jersey Supreme Court expands NJLAD's scope: Non-disparagement clauses now unenforceable in employment agreements
    • HOUSE NEWS—Members introduce bipartisan bill to nullify executive order, restore federal workers’ collective bargaining rights
    • HOUSE NEWS—Oversight Committee marks up, favorably reports ‘Reorganizing Government Act of 2025’
    • LABOR—ARBITRATION—Police officer’s termination upheld due to social media posts
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Court grants injunctive relief to intelligence officers facing termination following DEI order
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—N.D. Ill.: Women in trades group wins TRO against DOL in challenge to executive orders intended to end equity programs
    • RETALIATION—N.D. Ill.: Employee reassigned to new machine after complaint about manager advances reprisal and age bias claims
    • SENATE NEWS—Bill would strengthen Privacy Act protections, allow Americans to sue government officials
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—6th Cir.: Pipe inspector, paid $100 per hour, was not salaried under FLSA
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—S.D. Ohio: FCA claims fail for lack of evidence of adverse action, retaliation, knowledge
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, SENATE NEWS—Bill would strengthen Privacy Act protections, allow Americans to sue government officials, (Apr 2, 2025)

    By Lauren Bikoff, MLS

    The new legislation is designed to bring the 50-year-old Privacy Act’s provisions into the digital age and to bolster consumer protections against data misuse.

    Senate Democrats have released the Privacy Modernization Act of 2025 to make it easi ...

    By Lauren Bikoff, MLS

    The new legislation is designed to bring the 50-year-old Privacy Act’s provisions into the digital age and to bolster consumer protections against data misuse.

    Senate Democrats have released the Privacy Modernization Act of 2025 to make it easier for Americans to sue government officials for the misuse of sensitive personal information in the wake of recent efforts by Elon Musk, the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and other government officials “illegally accessing personal data held by the government, including Social Security numbers, medical history, financial data, and other sensitive data.” The bill is sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.).

    “Over 50 years ago, Congress passed the Privacy Act to protect the public against the exploitation and misuse of their personal information held by the government,” Markey said. “Today, with Elon Musk and the DOGE team recklessly seeking to access Americans’ sensitive data, it’s time to bring this law into the digital age. The federal government should be a steward of our privacy—not a source of surveillance.”

    Enacted after the Watergate and Counterintelligence Program (COINTELPRO) scandals, the Privacy Act of 1974 required agencies to disclose what personal data they collect and why, limited how officials could use or share that data, and created remedies for when the government held incorrect data about a person or otherwise broke the rules. The Privacy Modernization Act of 2025 would:

    • increase civil and criminal penalties for violations of the Privacy Act, including making it a felony to disclose records for personal gain, malicious harm, or commercial advantage, punishable by fines of up to $250,000 and 10 years in prison;

    • strengthen court authority to stop programs and actions while lawsuits are pending and allow Americans to recover for a range of damages, including the mental and emotional distress caused by privacy violations;

    • modernize the law to cover any information that identifies or is linked or reasonably linkable to an individual or a device that is linked or reasonably linkable to an individual;

    • limit information sharing to the minimum necessary for a legally authorized purpose, and only if consistent with what an agency previously stated they would use records for; and

    • narrow the so-called “routine use” exception for sharing information by further requiring that “routine use” disclosures be “appropriate and reasonably necessary.”

    News: FederalLegislation Privacy AgencyNews ComputerFraudPrivacy LitigationNewsTrends

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use