Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—5th Cir.: Southwest Airlines did not intentionally discriminate against pro-life flight attendant
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEXUAL HARASSMENT—S.D. Fla.: Patient services supervisor failed to establish liability for supervisor’s alleged harassment
    • EEOC NEWS—New lawsuit alleges religious discrimination; race, national origin, disability discrimination claims settled
    • EMPLOYEE LEAVE—E.D. Cal.: Walmart employee, fired after family tragedy, ensuing leave, advances most claims
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—OSHA extends heat hazard program: employers should act before summer sets in
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Trump targets a major legal theory of discrimination
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—D.C. Circuit stays its own stay, ‘effectively requires the government to pay out over $25 million in disputed grants’
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Shortly after EO targeting disparate impact, DOJ stipulates to dismissal of long-running suit against NYC
    • PROCEDURE—6th Cir.: Construction company failed to show Acting GC violated Board rules by dismissing complaint allegations
    • PROCEDURE—D.C. Cir.: TRO ordering disbursement of Radio Free Europe funding stayed pending appeal
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—D.D.C.: Eight fired probationary federal employees fail to secure preliminary injunction
    • REPORTS—Ghost job postings are common, but protections for job seekers remain nearly nonexistent
    • SUPREME COURT NEWS—Justice Souter’s passing mourned
    • WORTH NOTING—Federal appeals court cases of note
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, REPORTS—Ghost job postings are common, but protections for job seekers remain nearly nonexistent, (May 9, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Federal Trade Commission

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    No bills have been introduced in Congress addressing ghost job postings, CRS explained.

    A release by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) details so-called ghost job postings, or online job postings for positions that do not exist or that employer ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    No bills have been introduced in Congress addressing ghost job postings, CRS explained.

    A release by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) details so-called ghost job postings, or online job postings for positions that do not exist or that employers are not planning to fill immediately. CRS noted that a decline in job postings in recent years may exacerbate job seekers’ concerns over ghost job postings.

    Reasons for ghost postings. CRS explained that ghost job postings can appear for a number of reasons. For example, employers may use these postings to: (1) evaluate the potential pool of candidates for future job postings or collect resumes for hiring at a later time; (2) suggest they are growing—either to signal to existing employees that they are replaceable, that their workload may soon be more widely shared, or to attract potential investors; (3) demonstrate that they have recruited a diverse pool of applicants, even though they plan to hire an internal candidate; or (4) look for extraordinary potential employees. Employers may even interview applicants while having no intention to hire anyone. However, CRS said, some ghost job postings are not deliberate, as circumstances may change that alter the employers’ intent to hire. Further, online job boards may automatically copy postings from other websites, and employers may remove the posting from one website, not knowing the post was copied elsewhere.

    Protections for job seekers. Deceptive job advertisements may violate federal consumer protection laws, CRS explained. Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act prohibits “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.” The FTC has enforced this provision against deceptive representations regarding money-making schemes and has acted against scams based on fake job placement services. The FTC’s Consumer Sentinel Network database shows that job and employment agency scams have nearly tripled from 2020 to 2024.

    However, extending FTC enforcement to ghost jobs would likely present legal challenges, CRS noted, as elements such as an employer’s intent to hire for a given position or harm to consumers from ghost job postings are not easily discoverable. Currently, no bills explicitly addressing ghost job postings have been introduced in Congress, though at least three states and Canada have proposed related legislation.

    News: Reports AgencyNews IndustryNewsTrends

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use