Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—11th Cir.: Florida’s highest court asked for guidance on copyrights in sound recordings
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • COPYRIGHT—S.D. Tex.: Record company owned master recordings made by Tejano musicians under recording agreements
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Greenberg Traurig snatches IP attorney Melissa Hunter-Ensor
    • PATENT NEWS: Inventor of technology to deter opioid abuse sues to correct inventorship, alleges fraudulent scheme
    • PATENT NEWS: Maker of hand held ‘candy fans’ hopes to blow down infringer
    • PATENT—E.D.N.Y.: Akamai decision did not preclude a finding of indirect infringement of luggage screening patent
    • PATENT—S.D. Cal.: Mad Catz did not infringe design patent for game controller
    • TRADEMARK—C.D. Cal.: Maker of 'pur pom' pomegranate-flavored beverages infringed POM Wonderful mark
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, PATENT NEWS: Inventor of technology to deter opioid abuse sues to correct inventorship, alleges fraudulent scheme, (Jun 30, 2016)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Roth Law Group LLC
    Organizations Mentioned:Roth Law Group, LLC | Waterville Valley Technologies, Inc.

    By Peter Reap, J.D., LL.M.

    Dr. John K. Thottathil has accused defendants Waterville Valley Technologies and its founder James Peltier of engaging in a fraudulent scheme to steal his invention of a prodrug technology related to oxycodone and oxymorphone ("the Thottathil Prodrug ...

    By Peter Reap, J.D., LL.M.

    Dr. John K. Thottathil has accused defendants Waterville Valley Technologies and its founder James Peltier of engaging in a fraudulent scheme to steal his invention of a prodrug technology related to oxycodone and oxymorphone ("the Thottathil Prodrug Technology") that would aid in deterring opioid abuse by patients of prescription opioids. In a complaint filed in the federal district court in Chicago, Thottathil contends that the defendants fraudulently filed a provisional patent in the second quarter of 2015 based on and encompassing the Thottathil Prodrug Technology without the knowledge or agreement of Thottathil, without naming Dr. Thottathil as the inventor.

    As detailed in the complaint, Thottathil’s Prodrug Technology delays the immediate euphoria that drug abusers seek and is therefore a valuable technology to deter abuse. Further, his Prodrug Technology protects against accidental and intentional overdose, misuse and abuse through crushing and intranasal snorting, non-prescribed methods of use (e.g., intravenous), and "dose–dumping" (e.g., mixing with alcoholic beverages).

    Thottathil and the defendants entered into an agreement on September 9, 2014, that envisioned (1) the securing of funding by the defendants to develop new Oxymorphone drug technologies based on Thottathil’s new prodrug platform; (2) Thottathil receiving royalties and profits for the project; and (3) joint ownership by the parties of the patents and intellectual property generated by the partnership. However, there is no agreement between Dr. Thottathil and Waterville and Peltier relating to the use of the Thottathil inventions, ideas, or confidential information other than for Oxymorphone.

    Subsequently, under Dr. Thottathil’s leadership and direction several oxymorphone drug candidates based on the Thottathil Prodrug Technology were developed. Then, Thottathil contends, in February 2015 while Dr. Thottathil was out of the country, upon information and belief, Waterville and Peltier secretly initiated a second project based on Dr. Thottathil’s Prodrug Technology targeting the opioid known as oxycodone. Starting in November 2015, Thottathil has been totally excluded and cut-off by the defendants from information regarding the research, development and manufacturing of the products that are based on Thottathil’s Prodrug Technology.

    The complaint includes a claim to correct the inventorship of one or more patent applications filed by the defendants’ that are based on Thottathil’s Prodrug Technology. It also includes claims for breach of contract, fraud, and a claim for violation of the Illinois Trade Secret Act, alleging that the defendants misappropriated Thottathil’s trade secrets to pursue the commercialization of the Thottathil Prodrug Technology without his consent. Thottathil requests injunctive relief, rescission, and damages.

    The complaint in Thottathil v. Waterville Valley Technologies, Inc., Case No. 1:16-cv-06826, was filed June 29, 2016.

    Attorneys: Karl W. Roth (Roth Law Group LLC) for Dr. John K. Thottathil.

    Companies: Waterville Valley Technologies, Inc.

    News: Patent TradeSecrets IllinoisNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use