Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • TRADEMARK NEWS: T-shirt seller requests High Court to curb interest awards in trademark cases
    • PATENT—D. Ariz.: Court considers sanctions against plaintiff’s lawyer in patent suit
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PATENT—N.D. Cal.: Coretronic fails to plead Sherman Act claim against Maxell in connection with projector patent
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PATENT—W.D. Tex.: Patent infringement claims against software company brought by patent licensee may proceed
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES—Ethical guidelines for use of AI explored at ACC 2026 Annual Meeting
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADE SECRETS—S.D.N.Y.: Former Guidepoint employees enjoined from using proprietary information in new business
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: STORYTELLER OVERLAND mark for clothing items succumbs to cancellation challenge
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, PATENT—N.D. Cal.: Coretronic fails to plead Sherman Act claim against Maxell in connection with projector patent, (Oct 13, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Mayer Brown LLP | Merchant & Gould LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Coretronic Corporation. | Maxell, Ltd.

    By Justin Marcus Smith, J.D.

    A belief that a legal conclusion about Maxell’s patent was true did not make it so, and Maxell was otherwise entitled to a presumption of patent enforceability.

    Coretronic Corporation failed to plead a Section 2 Sherman Act claim against Maxell ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use