Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • TRADEMARK—N.D. Ill.: Color-cube seller secures invalidation of rival’s ‘CMY CUBES’ trademarks, defeats infringement claims
    • COPYRIGHT—D. Mass.: Preliminary injunction sought by software company against former employee denied
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • COPYRIGHT—D.N.J.: Target defeats summary judgment bid in blood-drip necklace copyright suit
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • COPYRIGHT—N.D. Ohio: Defendant in copyright suit involving school shield design awarded $34K in attorney fees
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PATENT—D. Del.: American Axle preserves $4 million driveshaft patent infringement verdict against Neapco
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PATENT—N.D. Ohio: Patent attorney’s motion for preliminary injunction to stop his USPTO discipline case denied
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, PATENT—D. Del.: American Axle preserves $4 million driveshaft patent infringement verdict against Neapco, (Sep 24, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:DLA Piper LLP (U.S. | Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. | Neapco Holdings LLC

    By Mandavi Singh, LL.M.

    Substantial evidence supported the jury’s finding that Neapco’s accused propshaft (driveshaft) manufacturing process satisfied the patent’s liner-tuning requirements, while its challenges to validity and damages failed.

    A federal ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use