Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—10th Cir.: Employees terminated in Spirit AeroSystems RIF did not establish ageist pattern, practice
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—4th Cir.: Nurse, fired after refusing COVID-19 vaccine on religious grounds, revives claims
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—(Smart) Watch out! The EEOC's take on wearable tech
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Court rules certain job protections for NLRB judges unconstitutional: What employers need to know
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—DOL civil monetary penalty amounts adjusted for inflation
    • LABOR—ARBITRATION—Guardian Ad Litem’s termination for insensitive remarks overturned
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Angi Services to pay $2.95M for misleading workers about pay
    • NLRB NEWS—Agency issues inclusive writing guide in furtherance of its DEIA program
    • NLRB NEWS—Settlement reached in charge against building services provider for maintaining no-poach provision in service contracts
    • ON THE LABOR FRONT—Following the NLRB Transition Playbook
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—10th Cir.: Court erred in dismissing First Amendment claim of officer fired after discovery of old Facebook posts
    • WAGE-HOUR—CLASS ACTIONS—S.D. Cal.: Final approval granted for $4.1 million settlement of employees’ claims related to screenings
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, ON THE LABOR FRONT—Following the NLRB Transition Playbook, (Jan 8, 2025)

    By Michael J. Soltis

    One may ask whether following this playbook is the best way to establish our national labor policy; however, neither party has publicly expressed an interest in changing the playbook.

    When the NLRB transitions from the control of one political party t ...

    By Michael J. Soltis

    One may ask whether following this playbook is the best way to establish our national labor policy; however, neither party has publicly expressed an interest in changing the playbook.

    When the NLRB transitions from the control of one political party to the other, the established playbook makes predicting the future less challenging. The playbook should be titled “Reverse and Restore” since the incoming party seeks to reverse the outgoing party’s key policy decisions and restore the policies of the incoming party. The playbook lays out the roadmap to achieve this goal.

    In mid-December, independent Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema joined Republicans to rebuff the Democratic effort to approve NLRB Chair Lauren McFerran for another five-year term. As a result, when the 119th Congress begins at noon on January 3, 2025, the five-member NLRB will have three members—two Democrats and one Republican—and two vacancies.

    While the Board describes the General Counsel position as “independent from the Board,” the General Counsel is typically aligned ideologically with the Board majority. It’s likely President Trump will advise NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo that she will be fired if she has not resigned before Inauguration Day, January 20, 2025.

    If President Trump follows the NLRB playbook, another bit of wisdom from Yogi Berra is apt: it will be déjà vu all over again. To read more about the NLRB playbook, see Mike Soltis’ latest On the Labor Front article: Following the NLRB Transition Playbook.

    MainStory: LaborNews Labor Procedure AgencyNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use