Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • Privacy Groups Ask ODNI to Disclose Extent of ‘Warrantless’ Surveillance
    • Senate approves CRA Resolution on CFPB’s ‘Payment Apps Rule’
    • Defining ‘artificial intelligence’ key to recommending framework on disclosure, panelists tell IAC
    • Another 10 Chinese ‘Contract Hackers’ Face U.S. Charges
    • Bill Would Block Huawei’s Access to U.S. Financial System
    • N.D. Ill.: Some consumer class action claims against ByteDance about use of CapCut app survive dismissal
    • Netherlands Seeks Input on Algorithmic Decision Making
    • Oklahoma Bill to Protect Children’s Personal Data Advances
    • Processing Activities Not Requiring DPIA Outlined by Latvian Agency
    • Senate Commerce Sets Session on Data Protection Bills
    • Telstra Pays Fine to Settle Australian Complaint Over Spam Texts
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, Oklahoma Bill to Protect Children’s Personal Data Advances, (Mar 6, 2025)

    By Carrie DeLeon

    The Oklahoma state House Health and Human Services Oversight Committee has passed a bill to require certain organizations that offer online services to complete data protection impact assessments to evaluate how their platforms might affect children.

    HB 1388 would direct certain entities to complete a data protection impact assessment for any online product, service, or feature that is “reasonably likely to be accessed and maintain documentation of the data protection impact assessment as long as the online product, service or feature is reasonably likely to be accessed.” Within five business days of a written request by the attorney general, a covered entity would be required to provide to the attorney general a list of all data protection impact assessments that had been completed.

    The legislation further would prohibit the processing of children’s personal data in ways that are inconsistent with their best interests, including profiling and the use of dark patterns. The bill would also require high default privacy settings and clear communication of privacy policies in age-appropriate language.

    According to the bill, only the state attorney general would be authorized to initiate enforcement. The bill has an effective date of Nov. 1.

    The bill (H.B. 1388, Reg Sess.) is sponsored by Rep. Toni Hasenbeck (R.).

    News: DataPrivacy StateLegislation

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use