Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS—9th Cir.: DOL must disclose its contractors’ workforce demographics to investigative news organization
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—E.D. Pa.: Nursing director, fired after clashing with staff, fails to show racial bias
    • DOJ NEWS—Bondi issues sweeping memo regarding federal funding recipients and ‘unlawful discrimination,’ lobs warning at private employers too
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Building an Exemption: California Construction Employers Allowed to Drug Test for Marijuana
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—OSHA Proposes First of Its Kind Heat Regulations for Indoor and Outdoor Workers
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—E.D. Mo.: Police officer failed to show employer’s justification for his termination pretextual—untruthfulness in interview
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Fourth Circuit sends CASA v. Trump back to district court
    • NLRB NEWS—Memo provides guidance for referring cases to the National Mediation Board
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—2d Cir.: Clerk spoke as a citizen when refusing to discuss investigation with judge
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—D.D.C.: VA supervisor, fired after providing false information to OIG, loses removal challenge
    • TRADE SECRETS—E.D. Tex.: Health staffing tech firm denied preliminary injunction in trade secret dispute
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, NLRB NEWS—Memo provides guidance for referring cases to the National Mediation Board, (Jul 31, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:National Mediation Board

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    When in doubt about whether an employer is within NLRA jurisdiction, Regions are told to submit the matter for referral to the NMB.

    In a new memorandum instructing how regions should address jurisdictional issues relating to whether employers are cove ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    When in doubt about whether an employer is within NLRA jurisdiction, Regions are told to submit the matter for referral to the NMB.

    In a new memorandum instructing how regions should address jurisdictional issues relating to whether employers are covered by the Railway Labor Act (RLA) or the NLRA, Acting General Counsel William Cowen sets out a bright-line rule that if in doubt, they should submit the referral to the National Mediation Board for its opinion. Cowen tells Regions that when they are investigating an unfair labor practice charge or representation petition and find themselves faced with “arguments or evidence revealing a question as to whether an employer is within NLRA jurisdiction,” they “will forthwith submit the matter for referral to the NMB for an advisory opinion consistent with internal guidelines.”

    Few referrals of late. While noting that, historically, the Board has followed a policy of referring jurisdictional questions regarding the RLA to the NMB, the memo contends that recently “almost no cases of questionable jurisdiction have been referred” and that, instead, when the jurisdictional question is in doubt or arguable, the Regions themselves have made the call. “This approach fails to respect the significant role of the RLA in maintaining stability in the transportation industry.”

    Protection of commerce. While the RLA and NLRA “share similar purposes” the RLA, the memo states, “seeks to protect the transportation industry from “any interruption to commerce,”[] through highly structured bargaining and dispute resolution processes governed by the NMB.” (Footnotes omitted.) “When the RLA’s statutory processes are usurped by reflexive decisions to assert jurisdiction under the NLRA,” Cowen contends, “our shared purposes of industrial stability, the free flow of commerce, and employee free choice are hindered or thwarted.”

    Difficult questions should go to Advice. The bottom line is that a “Region investigating a case in which jurisdiction is unclear should hold the case in abeyance and submit it for referral to the NMB” and, in cases that present “difficult questions or unique circumstances,” those should be submitted to Advice.

    News: LaborNews AgencyNews Labor GCNNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use