Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Ousted inspectors general at DOL, other agencies file suit
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—10th Cir.: Former HR generalist failed to exhaust ‘regarded as’ claim before EEOC
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—Conn. App.: Hospital prevails against claims of fired LPN with alcoholism, bipolar disorder
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—E.D. Wis.: EEOC denied injunctive relief following verdict for Walmart employee with Down Syndrome
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—W.D. Wash.: White employee who challenged Seattle’s DEI program fails to advance HWE claim
    • EMPLOYEE STATUS—M.D. Ga.: Court finds in favor of hospital system in EMTALA whistleblower suit
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—5 Things Contractors and Grant Recipients Should Know About the Executive Order on DEI
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—EEOC Acting Chair Issues Statement Announcing Commission's Plans to Remove Gender Ideology and Return to Mission Of ‘Protecting Women in the Workplace’
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—DOJ reaches settlement with Oklahoma City Public Schools following alleged USERRA violation
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—In federal-aid freeze showdown, First Circuit rejects Trump Administration’s bid for administrative stay of district court’s TRO
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Unions, federal employees sue DOGE and others for privacy violations
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—N.D. Ill.: Corporate recruiter gets trial on claims she was misclassified under the FLSA’s administrative employee exemption
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—S.D. Tex.: Employer granted summary judgment finding that employees were exempt from FLSA requirements
    • WHITE HOUSE NEWS—Trump administration dismisses Chair of MSPB
    • WHITE HOUSE NEWS—Trump executive order seeks to significantly reduce size of federal government
    • WHITE HOUSE NEWS—Trump orders elimination of Federal Executive Institute
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Ousted inspectors general at DOL, other agencies file suit, (Feb 12, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:U.S. Department of Labor

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    The eight former IGs were nonpartisan officials whose firings, they allege, “violated unambiguous federal statutes” intended to protect them from such interference.

    Earlier today, the former Inspectors General at eight major U.S. agencie ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    The eight former IGs were nonpartisan officials whose firings, they allege, “violated unambiguous federal statutes” intended to protect them from such interference.

    Earlier today, the former Inspectors General at eight major U.S. agencies, including the Departments of Labor, Defense, Veterans Affairs, Health and Human Services, State, Agriculture, and Education, along with the Small Business Administration, filed suit against President Trump and the heads of those various agencies alleging multiple violations of the law stemming from their summary, emailed terminations based on “changing priorities.”

    They contend that their terminations violate the Inspector General Act, 5 U.S.C. § 403(b), constitute ultra vires government action under common law, and, in the absence of other relief, that they are entitled to a writ of mandamus compelling the defendants not to obstruct with their exercise of duties.

    No notice, no case-specific rationale. IGs, they allege, are nonpartisan officials who serve as independent watchdogs to ensure effective and efficient operation of government. Federal law requires that they be appointed without regard to political affiliation and, under the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended by the Securing Inspector General Independence Act, in order to remove an IG, the President must notify Congress about the planned removal at least 30 days in advance and must also provide a substantive, case-specific rationale for termination. In the case of these IGs, they allege, neither condition was satisfied.

    Larry Turner, who held the role of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Labor, had served as Acting IG during Trump’s first administration and assumed the official role in 2021.

    The lawsuit was filed in D.C. federal court; the case is No. 1:25-cv-00415.

    MainStory: TopStory LitigationNewsTrends AgencyNews WhiteHouseNews Discharge PublicEmployees GCNNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use