Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • SUPREME COURT NEWS—Justices appear surprised in largely uncontested oral argument on burden of proof for majority-group Title VII plaintiffs
    • AGENCY NEWS—OMB issues guidance on agency RIF and reorganization plans
    • CONTRACT CLAIMS—Conn. App.: Police officers who retired before distribution date not entitled to retroactive wages
    • DISABILITY—DISCRIMINATION—S.D. Tex.: Manager, allegedly harassed because of Tourette’s Syndrome, advances claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—9th Cir.: Postmaster who alleged she was targeted based on Chinese ethnicity gets shot at disparate treatment claim
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—2d Cir.: Summary judgment against school employee’s request for accommodation from COVID-19 vaccination policy affirmed
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Implementing NY's Retail Worker Safety Act: a new amendment means changes for employers of all sizes
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Noncompete bans—next up: Ohio
    • HOUSE NEWS—Education and Workforce Committee’s hearing highlights tensions about economy, DOGE
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Farm worker union sues DHS after members subjected to ‘unlawful dragnet’
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—New lawsuit filed by non-profit serving women in trades, challenging anti-DEI executive orders as unconstitutional
    • PRIVACY—W.D. Wash.: Military nurse suing Thesis, Nutraceuticals over alleged amphetamine adulteration survives dismissal on most claims
    • STATE-LAW CLAIMS—N.D. Cal.: Court denies San Francisco’s motion to dismiss in Airlines for America healthcare lawsuit
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Farm worker union sues DHS after members subjected to ‘unlawful dragnet’, (Feb 27, 2025)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    “Operation Return to Sender,” the complaint contends, “tore families apart and terrorized the community. It also violated the law.”

    United Farm Workers, the largest farm worker union in the United States, has filed a putati ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    “Operation Return to Sender,” the complaint contends, “tore families apart and terrorized the community. It also violated the law.”

    United Farm Workers, the largest farm worker union in the United States, has filed a putative class action suit in federal court in California on behalf of its members, alleging that they have been harmed by Border Patrol’s unlawful stop, arrest, and expulsion practices and fear being subjected to those practices in the future.

    “Operation Return to Sender.” The lawsuit describes that in January 2025, Border Patrol agents based at the United States-Mexico border traveled north to Bakersfield to launch a nearly weeklong sweep through predominantly Latino areas of the area “to stop, detain, and arrest people of color who appeared to be farm workers or day laborers, regardless of their actual immigration status or individual circumstances.”

    At least four UFW members, it alleges, have been subjected to Border Patrol’s practice of conducting stops without regard to reasonable suspicion and effecting arrests without regard to probable cause of flight risk. Two of its members, it alleges, also were coerced into accepting expulsion via voluntary departure.

    Union’s members are afraid of being targeted. “Many UFW members,” it adds, “regardless of the stability or permanence of their immigration status, fear Border Patrol will continue to target farm workers with its unlawful practices, especially those who appear non-white.”

    One of the named plaintiffs is a U.S. Citizen and one is a lawful permanent resident; all have lived and worked in the United States for many years.

    The suit seeks preliminary and permanent injunctions, among other relief.

    The case is No. 1:25-cv-00246.

    News: LitigationNewsTrends LaborNews IndividualRights AgencyNews WhiteHouseNews ImmigrationNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use