Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—U.S.: High Court affirms stay of order granting reinstatement of FTC Commissioner
    • AGENCY NEWS—FTC to hold October workshop on noncompetes
    • ARBITRATION—E.D. Pa.: Motion to compel arbitration of sexual harassment, other claims, denied
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—E.D. Cal.: Dollar General warehouse employee with back injury heads towards trial with various claims
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Federal Trade Commission Non-Compete Action and Enforcement
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Stepping Into a Void? New York Attempts to Extend New York State Labor Relations Act to Private-Sector Employers That Should Be Covered By National Labor Relations Act; NLRB General Counsel Sues Over Preemption Concerns
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—DHS has proposed a weighted lottery system to apply to the cap-subject H-1B visa selection process
    • LABOR—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES—N.D. Ill.: NLRB regional director denied Section 10(j) injunction after leasing company withdrew recognition of CBA
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—AFGE, AFSCME filed another lawsuit against the Trump administration
    • LOCAL LEGISLATION—CALIFORNIA—Travel time now included in working time for overtime pay purposes for in-home supportive services and waiver personal care services
    • RETALIATION—1st Cir.: Airline worker, fired after taking leave for work-related injury, revives claim
    • RETALIATION—D. Conn.: Black Walmart employee fails to show race bias, but retaliatory discharge claim goes to trial
    • SENATE NEWS—Senators seek answers on FDIC OIG suspending workforce inquiry
    • WAGE-HOUR—OVERTIME—D. Md.: Home health care provider violated overtime, minimum wage and recordkeeping provisions of FLSA
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—AFGE, AFSCME filed another lawsuit against the Trump administration, (Sep 23, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:American Federation of Government Employees

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    This suit focuses on the August 28, 2025, executive order regarding the collective bargaining rights of employees of USAGM and Voice of America.

    Late last week, the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and the American Federation of Stat ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    This suit focuses on the August 28, 2025, executive order regarding the collective bargaining rights of employees of USAGM and Voice of America.

    Late last week, the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) filed another lawsuit against the Trump administration related to its actions towards public employees. This time, they have filed suit regarding the August 28, 2025, executive order that purports to strip employees at the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) and its Voice of America (VOA) of their collective bargaining rights.

    In the lawsuit, filed in D.C. federal court, the unions contend that the administration’s union-busting action is a direct attempt to prevent those agency’s employees, comprised of journalists and other media professionals, along with the unions that represent them (AFGE Local 1812 and AFSCME Local 1418), from exercising their First Amendment rights by pursuing litigation and filing grievances to challenge the administration’s closure and dismantlement of USAGM and VOA. Specifically, this speech relates to a previous lawsuit brought in March and the events following the federal district court’s issuance of a preliminary injunction in that matter.

    They note that the administration had become “increasingly frustrated with” their speech and petitioning activity and had “publicly expressed its growing animosity” towards them in the days before the executive order was issued.

    The unions are asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to issue a preliminary injunction restoring workers’ collective bargaining rights.

    News: LitigationNewsTrends LaborNews WhiteHouseNews PublicEmployees Layoffs Labor IndividualRights

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use