Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • PROCEDURE —11th Cir.: District court’s order denying motion to compel arbitration not appealable under collateral order doctrine
    • ARBITRATION—S.D.N.Y.: Wage claims filed with sexual harassment claims render entire arbitration agreement unenforceable
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—S.D.N.Y.: Executive chef, fired following workplace knee injury, gets trial on most claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—W.D. Wash.: Accommodating deputies’ objections to COVID-19 vaccines would have caused undue hardship
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Colorado Expands FAMLI to Include 12 Weeks of Neonatal Care Leave
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—New Jersey Proposes Rules to Clarify Far-Reaching Pay Transparency Law: 4 Action Steps for Employers
    • HOUSE NEWS—Discharge petition that would advance ‘Protect America’s Workforce Act’ reaches threshold required for House vote
    • LABOR NEWS—Preliminary injunction issued against President Trump and USAGM for cancellation of collective bargaining rights
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Amicus brief from attorneys general argues banning transgender individuals from military service harms states
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Lawsuit filed over rescission of transgender Air Force and Space Force members’ retirement benefits
    • NAA CORNER—Be careful what you wish for: mandatory arbitration and class action waivers
    • PRIVACY—E.D. Ky.: Reporting agency not automatically liable for FCRA violation based on inaccurate information
    • RETALIATION—W.D. Tenn.: Sonographer fired after complaining about breast milk pumping breaks entitled to trial on retaliation claim
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, LABOR NEWS—Preliminary injunction issued against President Trump and USAGM for cancellation of collective bargaining rights, (Nov 18, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:American Federation of Government Employees

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    In a ruling from the bench, a federal judge in D.C. determined that actions taken against AFSCME and AFGE and their affiliated local unions at USAGM were “clearly retaliatory.”

    On Friday, a federal judge in the District of Columbia grant ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    In a ruling from the bench, a federal judge in D.C. determined that actions taken against AFSCME and AFGE and their affiliated local unions at USAGM were “clearly retaliatory.”

    On Friday, a federal judge in the District of Columbia granted a motion for a preliminary injunction sought as part of a lawsuit filed by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME); the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE); the Voice of America Employees Union, AFSCME Local 1418; and AFGE Local 1812 against the Trump administration’s August 28, 2025, executive order.

    Targeted retribution. According to those unions’ announcement of the ruling, the judge determined that the enjoined August 28 order directly connected to the March executive order and its accompanying Fact Sheet, which the “judge described as in effect threatening the following: ‘Unions that supported him, they’ll be fine, but other unions, not so much.’” The judge observed that the unions nevertheless “kept fighting” and found that the subsequent actions taken against them were “clearly retaliatory” and showed a pattern of First Amendment retaliation. According to the unions, “The judge concluded his oral opinion by finding it was ‘in the public interest’ to restore labor protections to USAGM employees because Voice of America is ‘voice of democracy.’”

    In their lawsuit, the unions allege that the administration’s actions are a direct attempt to prevent the agency’s employees—who are journalists and other media professionals—and their unions from exercising their First Amendment rights.

    “We'll continue to fight for the collective bargaining rights of our members against an administration determined to strip them away,” said AFSCME President Lee Saunders.

    “The administration’s attacks on Voice of America and USAGM workers were plainly illegal and retaliatory,” said AFGE National President Everett Kelley. “The Court’s finding that the administration once again violated our members’ constitutional rights, including their First Amendment rights, highlights exactly why unions matter.”

    The case is No. 1:25-cv-03306.

    News: LaborNews LitigationNewsTrends Labor WhiteHouseNews AgencyNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use