Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
    • Easement Deduction Limited To Residential Value; Penalty Sustained (Savannah Shoals, LLC, CA-11)
    • IRS Did Not Abuse Discretion in Sustaining Levy; Additions to Tax Not Subject to Challenge (Tellock, TCM)
    • IRS Responses to RFA Were Unsatisfactory; Deductions for Premiums Denied (Beveled Edge Insurance Company, Inc., TCM)
    • Individual Leaked Tax Information of POTUS and Taxpayers (Littlejohn, CA-D.C.)
    • Value of Gift Upon Trust Termination Determined (Lewis, TCM)
  • Articles
  • Articles

    Federal Tax Day - Current, J.2, IRS Responses to RFA Were Unsatisfactory; Deductions for Premiums Denied (Beveled Edge Insurance Company, Inc., TCM), (Jul 21, 2026)

    In consolidated cases, the IRS disallowed deductions for premiums paid in captive insurance arrangements. The lead taxpayer was an insurance company (I1). The IRS also increased the income of I1.

    Request for Admissions

    The taxpayers served a request fo ...

    In consolidated cases, the IRS disallowed deductions for premiums paid in captive insurance arrangements. The lead taxpayer was an insurance company (I1). The IRS also increased the income of I1.

    Request for Admissions

    The taxpayers served a request for admissions (RFA) to the IRS. The court deemed that the IRS’ responses did not satisfy the taxpayers’ requests under Rule 90. The court referenced Asea, Inc. v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 669 F.2d 1242, 1247 (CA-9) (1981), highlighting it had discretion to rule when IRS responses were not in good faith despite a prior court order.

    Evasive Pattern and Sanction

    The IRS did not have a pattern of evasive responses related to the RFA. However, the court noted that multiple objections from the IRS were not justified. The court did not impose a sanction on the IRS.

    Beveled Edge Insurance Company, Inc., TC Memo. 2026-57, Dec. 62,868(M)

    Other References:

    • Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure

    • CCH Reference - FED ¶42,250.68

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use