Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • FinCEN Postpones Investment Adviser Rule Until 2028 (FinCEN Final Rule RIN 1506-AB58 and 1506-AB69)
    • IRS Assessment Was Proper Supplemental Assessment, Amended Liability Claim Allowed (In re Kossoff PLLC, DC N.Y.)
    • IRS Did Not Abuse Discretion in Rejecting Offer-in-Compromise and Sustaining Lien (Crawford, TCM)
    • IRS Issues Additional Guidance on Retroactive Qualified Electing Fund Ruling Requests (Rev. Proc. 2026-10)
    • IRS Properly Denied Refund to Individuals Based on Issue Preclusion (Palaniappan, CA-9)
    • Individual Not Entitled to Continue Collection Due Process Challenge (Dunn, TCM)
    • OECD Releases Pillar Two Side-by-Side Guidance
    • Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund Financing Rate Expiration Impact (Ann. 2026-2)
    • This Week's CCH FEDERAL TAX WEEKLY, Issue No. 02, Now Available
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Federal Tax Day - Current, J.2, IRS Did Not Abuse Discretion in Rejecting Offer-in-Compromise and Sustaining Lien (Crawford, TCM), (Jan 8, 2026)

    The IRS did not abuse its discretion in rejecting an individual’s offer in compromise and sustaining the filing of a Notice of Federal Tax Lien. The Tax Court found that the Appeals Office reasonably concluded that the proposed offer did not r ...

    The IRS did not abuse its discretion in rejecting an individual’s offer in compromise and sustaining the filing of a Notice of Federal Tax Lien. The Tax Court found that the Appeals Office reasonably concluded that the proposed offer did not reflect reasonable collection potential and that statutory and administrative requirements were satisfied.

    The individual was assessed trust fund recovery penalties as a responsible person for unpaid employment taxes under Code Sec. 6672. The IRS issued Letter 1153 by certified mail to the last known address, advising of the proposed assessment and appeal rights. The assessment was valid as delivery was confirmed and no administrative protest was filed.

    Following lien filing, a Collection Due Process hearing was requested under Code Sec. 6320. An offer in compromise was submitted based on doubt as to collectibility. The Appeals Office evaluated financial information and determined that income and asset equity demonstrated the ability to pay more than the amount offered. Requests for additional substantiation were made, but documentation provided was incomplete and unreliable.

    T.A. Crawford, TC Memo. 2026-3, Dec. 62,803(M)

    Other References:

    • Code Sec. 6320

    • CCH Reference - FED ¶38,134.89

    • Code Sec. 6672

    • CCH Reference - FED ¶39,780.705

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use