Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—E.D.N.Y.: Political memes, Trump comments not enough to support Jewish assistant principal’s Title VII claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—PREGNANCY—D.N.J.: Railroad worker advances PUMP Act claims amid pumping-space dispute
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—8th Cir.: Summary judgment affirmed for construction company in lead installer’s Title VII sex discrimination and retaliation suit
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—A Possible Shift in the WARN Winds? What Employers Need to Know After Dargon
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Georgia Gives First Offenders a True Second Chance: Employer Rules for Hiring
    • INDUSTRY NEWS, TRENDS—Two former Volkswagen Group engineers charged with insider trading
    • LABOR NEWS—Teamsters report organizing victories, contract gains, and strike actions nationwide
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Judge dismisses challenge to Trump Religious Liberty Commission
    • NAA CORNER—Current issues in public safety
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—7th Cir.: Correctional officer’s termination did not violate constitutional free speech and due process rights
    • REPORTS—GAO finds millions of working adults rely on Medicaid and SNAP, with large employers recurring among top-state lists
    • WAGE-HOUR—CLASS ACTIONS—7th Cir.: Employer properly calculated technician’s overtime pay, excluded holiday premiums from regular rate
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—9th Cir.: Former school employee cannot revive claims concerning grant-funded Hawaii trip
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, INDUSTRY NEWS, TRENDS—Two former Volkswagen Group engineers charged with insider trading, (Jul 28, 2026)

    Organizations Mentioned:Rivian Automotive, Inc.

    By R. Jason Howard, J.D.

    One searched “statute of limitations insider trading,” and a close family member searched “how is insider trading prosecuted?”

    An unsealed indictment in the Southern District of New York charges two former Volkswagen Group ...

    By R. Jason Howard, J.D.

    One searched “statute of limitations insider trading,” and a close family member searched “how is insider trading prosecuted?”

    An unsealed indictment in the Southern District of New York charges two former Volkswagen Group engineers with insider trading based on their use of material nonpublic information concerning a multi-billion-dollar joint venture with Rivian Automotive, Inc., which led to more than $300,000 in ill-gotten gains (USA v. Stamp, No. 26 CRIM 316 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2026)).

    The unsealed indictment alleges that between April and July 2024, the two former engineers who were employees of a Volkswagen subsidiary and worked in the United States on temporary assignment from Germany, used their position to gain access to the confidential information and then began purchasing options and equity positions in Rivian.

    On June 25, 2025, Rivian and Volkswagen publicly announced their joint venture, and Rivian’s share price rose 23 percent the following day. The pair then sold their Rivian positions, with one realizing approximately $250,000 in profits and the other realizing approximately $50,000 in profits. A close family member of one of the engineers also realized approximately $12,000 in profits.

    The pair understood their actions were illegal because eight days prior to the announcement of the joint venture, one searched “statute of limitations insider trading,” and following the announcement the close family member searched, in German, “how is insider trading prosecuted?”

    The pair are each charged with one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison; one count of securities fraud under Title 15, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison; and one count of securities fraud under Title 18, which carries a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison.

    The case is No. 26 CRIM 316.

    News: IndustryNewsTrends WhiteCollarCrime AgencyNews LitigationNewsTrends

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use