Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • PROCEDURE—D.D.C.: Judge Howell rejects Trump administration’s disqualification motion in Perkins Coie EO case
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—2d Cir.: Ability to perform job functions without reasonable accommodations does not preclude ADA claim
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—6 biggest changes to expect as OSHA moves to overhaul fire brigade rule to cover emergency response workers
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Trump revokes Biden federal contractor minimum wage mandate: what to expect next
    • HOUSE NEWS—Democratic leaders demand reinstatement of fired EEOC Commissioners
    • IMMIGRATION NEWS—D.C. Circuit declines to stay district court’s TRO in suit over Trump administration’s use of Alien Enemies Act for removals
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—AFGE asks court to compel or hold OPM in contempt for failing to follow orders regarding reinstating federal workers
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—D.C. Circuit grants emergency stay of district court’s discovery order in state AGs’ suit against Musk and DOGE
    • PROCEDURE—7th Cir.: Employee in county prosecutor’s office barred from advancing discrimination, Section 1983 claims
    • PROCEDURE—E.D. Pa.: Unsupported opinions and lack of qualification doom expert reports
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—9th Cir.: Government denied emergency stay of order requiring reinstatement offers for fired probationary employees
    • WAGE-HOUR—WORKING TIME—8th Cir.: DOL revives suit over meal break deductions from employees’ pay
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, IMMIGRATION NEWS—D.C. Circuit declines to stay district court’s TRO in suit over Trump administration’s use of Alien Enemies Act for removals, (Mar 27, 2025)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    One judge dissented on grounds of jurisdiction and irreparable harm.

    In an order issued yesterday, the D.C. Circuit denied the emergency motions for stay filed by the government in a lawsuit brought over the Trump administration’s efforts to re ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    One judge dissented on grounds of jurisdiction and irreparable harm.

    In an order issued yesterday, the D.C. Circuit denied the emergency motions for stay filed by the government in a lawsuit brought over the Trump administration’s efforts to remove individuals from the United States under the Alien Enemies Act. Below, Judge Boasberg ruled against the administration, leading it not only to challenge the decision, but also to ask the D.C. Circuit to “immediately reassign” the case to a different judge. It also led to Trump’s social media post that, in turn, resulted in this rare public statement by U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Roberts: ““For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”

    In the D.C. Circuit’s order the court also granted the motions to participate as amicus curiae filed by several entities and officials.

    Judge Henderson and Judge Millett issued separate concurring statements along with the order. Judge Walker issued a dissenting statement as well.

    News: ImmigrationNews LitigationNewsTrends Immigration WhiteHouseNews FedTracker

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use