Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • PUBLIC COMPANY REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE—SEC moves to rescind controversial climate disclosure rules
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • ENFORCEMENT—D. Mass.: SEC, DOJ bring charges against wide-ranging insider trading ring
    • EXCHANGES AND MARKET REGULATION—Selig defends CFTC prediction market lawsuits v. states, says they ensure agency’s jurisdiction
    • FRAUD AND MANIPULATION—Trader to pay $200K penalty to CFTC to settle spoofing charges
    • FRAUD AND MANIPULATION—U.S.: Petition asks High Court to clarify scienter pleading standards
    • STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES—Webinar panelists stress need for change management in effective AI scaling
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Securities Regulation Daily Wrap Up, FRAUD AND MANIPULATION—Trader to pay $200K penalty to CFTC to settle spoofing charges, (May 7, 2026)

    By Rebecca E. Hoffman, J.D.

    He is also barred from commodities trading or associating with people or entities registered with or exempt from registration with the Commission, for one month.

    The CFTC announced May 6 that a New York trader has settled CFTC charges of spoofing whil ...

    By Rebecca E. Hoffman, J.D.

    He is also barred from commodities trading or associating with people or entities registered with or exempt from registration with the Commission, for one month.

    The CFTC announced May 6 that a New York trader has settled CFTC charges of spoofing while trading treasury futures. The trader agreed to pay a civil money penalty and discontinue any commodities trading activity for a month (In the Matter of Sidney Lebental, CFTC Docket No. 26-01 (May 1, 2026)).

    The CFTC determined that the respondent violated Commodity Exchange Act Section 4c(a)(5)(C), 7 U.S.C. § 6c(a)(5)(C), approximately 50 times between January and September of 2019. Section 4c(a)(5)(C) prohibits spoofing, defined by the statute as “bidding or offering with the intent to cancel the bid or offer before execution.” His method was to place orders for cash Treasuries, and then on the opposite side of the market, place orders for correlated Treasury futures contracts (usually the “Ultra Bond” futures contract). He would cancel the latter orders when the original orders were at least partially filled.

    “In placing these Spoof Orders, [the respondent] intentionally or recklessly sent false signals of increased supply or demand to trick participants into executing against the Genuine Orders,” the CFTC said. The respondent’s intent when placing the “spoof orders” was to cancel them, the order emphasized.

    The respondent agreed, without admitting or denying the charges, to pay the $200,000 penalty along with any post-judgment interest within 10 days. He also consented to cease and desist from violating Section 4c(a)(5)(C), and to refrain from trading or being involved in any transaction dealing with commodity interests, directly or indirectly, for 30 days.

    The order is No. 26-01.

    LitigationEnforcement: CFTCNews Enforcement ExchangesMarketRegulation FraudManipulation

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use