Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • FEDERAL PREEMPTION—D. Nev.: Nevada federal court reverses course on Kalshi event contracts, allows state gaming enforcement action to proceed
    • FRAUD AND MANIPULATION—11th Cir.: Eleventh Circuit revives fraud suit alleging NextEra misled investors about election-interference scandal
    • FRAUD AND MANIPULATION—D.N.J.: Shareholder fraud claims stemming from failed bank merger dismissed without prejudice
    • FRAUD AND MANIPULATION—S.D.N.Y.: Hedge fund solicitor robs 25 investors of $1.5M
    • PROXIES—Fla. Cir. Ct.: Florida sues ISS, Glass Lewis for antitrust violations
    • REGULATION TRACKER—Upcoming SEC and CFTC comment deadlines and effective dates
    • VITAL BRIEFING—If there is one thing to know about the current proxy season, it is this…
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Securities Regulation Daily Wrap Up, FRAUD AND MANIPULATION—11th Cir.: Eleventh Circuit revives fraud suit alleging NextEra misled investors about election-interference scandal, (Dec 1, 2025)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Gupta Wessler, LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Florida Power & Light | Gupta Wessler, PLLC | NextEra Energy | Nextera Energy, Inc. | Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, LLP

    By Elena Eyber, J.D.

    Eleventh Circuit held that investors adequately alleged loss causation by linking NextEra’s public denials and later disclosures to a significant stock drop.

    The Eleventh Circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal of investorsȁ ...

    By Elena Eyber, J.D.

    Eleventh Circuit held that investors adequately alleged loss causation by linking NextEra’s public denials and later disclosures to a significant stock drop.

    The Eleventh Circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal of investors’ securities fraud claims against NextEra Energy and its subsidiary, Florida Power & Light (FPL). The lower court had held that plaintiffs failed to adequately plead loss causation. The Eleventh Circuit disagreed, finding that the complaint plausibly alleged that NextEra’s public denials of its alleged political-interference scheme artificially maintained the company’s stock price until corrective disclosures (particularly the CEO’s abrupt departure and NextEra’s surprise risk filings) revealed the truth and triggered a significant market decline. Because the complaint sufficiently connected the alleged fraud to the economic loss, the Eleventh Circuit remanded for further proceedings, including evaluation of the plaintiffs’ Section 20(a) control-person claim (City of Hollywood Police Officers Retirement System v. Nextera Energy, Inc., No. 24-13372 (11th Cir. Nov. 26, 2025)).

    Misstatements and plausibility. The Eleventh Circuit emphasized that its role at the pleading stage is not to decide whether NextEra and FPL actually committed the political misconduct alleged, but whether the plaintiffs sufficiently alleged actionable misrepresentations and scienter. The Eleventh Circuit held that they did. The opinion identified detailed allegations that senior executives, equipped with internal documents such as the “Robo Memorandum,” publicly disclaimed any involvement in the ghost-candidate operations, covert political funding, or related schemes despite evidence suggesting they knew the denials were false. The Eleventh Circuit found these denials specific, factual, and plausibly misleading, not mere corporate puffery or immaterial commentary. Taken together, the statements formed a coherent theory of securities fraud: that NextEra knowingly concealed a politically explosive scheme whose revelation would foreseeably affect investor perceptions.

    Loss-causation. Regarding loss-causation, the Eleventh Circuit found that the plaintiffs plausibly alleged that the truth about NextEra’s risks emerged gradually but crystallized with the January 25, 2023, disclosures. That day, FPL abruptly severed ties with its CEO and NextEra filed atypical risk notifications tied to the allegations, events followed by an 8.7 percent share-price drop erasing more than $14 billion in market value. The Eleventh Circuit held that these events could reasonably constitute a corrective disclosure because they conveyed new, material information to the market about previously concealed political activity and potential legal exposure. The Eleventh Circuit noted that corrective information need not be a confession; circumstantial revelations that reveal the falsity of prior statements can suffice.

    Reversal and remand. Because the complaint sufficiently pled both materially false statements and a causal link between those statements and the alleged economic loss, the Eleventh Circuit held that dismissal with prejudice was improper. The Eleventh Circuit reversed and remanded, directing the district court to proceed with the case, including addressing the plaintiffs’ Section 20(a) control-person claim, which the lower court had not reached because it dismissed the predicate Section 10(b) claim.

    The case is No. 24-13372.

    Judge: Tjoflat, G.

    Attorneys: Matthew Wessler (Gupta Wessler, LLP) for City of Hollywood Police Officers Retirement System and The Pembroke Pines Firefighters and Police Officers Pension Fund. Kannon K. Shanmugam (Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, LLP) for Nextera Energy, Inc.

    Companies: Nextera Energy, Inc.

    LitigationEnforcement: CorporateGovernance DirectorsOfficers FormsFilings FraudManipulation InvestorEducation PublicCompanyReportingDisclosure RiskManagement ShareholderActivismNews FloridaNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use