Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • ANTITRUST—W.D. Wash.: Yardi rent-fixing suit moves to broader discovery as court denies summary judgment on remaining claims
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: EC approves Kimberly-Clark/Kenvue tie up, with conditions
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: False advertising action concerning ‘naturally flavored’ candy product may proceed in part
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Apple awarded $25,000 sanction against counsel for Coronavirus Reporter
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC sues allegedly fraudulent sextortion help firm
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS: Supreme Court denies review in Ohio direct wine delivery restrictions case
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • RICO—E.D Ky.: 3M RICO claims over allegedly fraudulent dust mask litigation may proceed
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS: Supreme Court denies review in Ohio direct wine delivery restrictions case, (Oct 14, 2026)

    By Brian Craig, J.D.

    The High Court declined to hear the case from the Sixth Circuit holding that Ohio’s prohibiting out-of-state retailers from shipping wine to Ohio consumers violated the Commerce Clause.

    The U.S. Supreme Court has denied certiorari and let stand ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use