Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—S.D. Ga.: Indirect purchaser hospitals failed to allege syringe, catheter monopolization claims
    • ADVERTISING—N.D.N.Y.: Chobani prohibited from representing Yoplait yogurt as unsafe
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: $254M attorneys’ fees, $9M costs sought in credit default swaps conspiracy case
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Canada Competition Bureau and China’s NRDC sign cooperation agreement
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC staff supports bill loosening supervision of Georgia dental hygienists
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: State pharmacy board allegedly misused authority to restrict competition
    • ANTITRUST—Cal. App.: Former DirecTV retailer failed to show horizontal, vertical conspiracy in sales leads bidding
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. Mich.: $14M in attorney fees awarded in hospital wage suppression conspiracy suit
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—N.D. Ill.: Forum selection clause mandated transfer of settlement agreement complaint
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Franchise attorneys Joyce Mazero, Leonard MacPhee join Gardere
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—N.D. Ill.: Forum selection clause mandated transfer of settlement agreement complaint, (Feb 1, 2016)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Fox Rothschild LLP | Massey & Gail | Schoenberg, Fisher, Newman & Rosenberg, Ltd.
    Organizations Mentioned:Fox Rothschild, LLP | Massey & Gail, LLP | Midwest Mailing & Shipping Systems, Inc. | Neopost USA Inc. | Schoenberg Fisher Newman & Rosenberg, LLC

    By Michael Menzhuber, J.D., LL.M.

    A dealer’s complaint, that its principal breached their settlement agreement, was remanded to state court by the federal district court in Chicago, since the settlement agreement expressly provided that any disputes would be brought in Illinoi ...

    By Michael Menzhuber, J.D., LL.M.

    A dealer’s complaint, that its principal breached their settlement agreement, was remanded to state court by the federal district court in Chicago, since the settlement agreement expressly provided that any disputes would be brought in Illinois state court (Midwest Mailing & Shipping Systems, Inc. v. Neopost USA Inc., January 28, 2016, Der-Yeghiayan, S.).

    Midwest Mailing & Shipping Systems, Inc. entered into a dealership agreement with Neopost USA, Inc., a business services company, under its former name, F.M.E. Corporation. Pursuant to the terms of the dealership agreement, Midwest was granted an exclusive territory in which to act on behalf of Neopost.

    In 2002, Midwest participated with other dealers in a suit against Neopost in an Illinois state court. After a settlement agreement was reached by the parties, Midwest contended that Neopost breached the terms of that agreement. Midwest brought the action in state court, and Neopost removed it to federal court. Midwest then moved to have the action remanded to state court.

    After determining that the settlement agreement’s forum section clause was valid, enforceable, and consistent with public interest, the court agreed with Midwest that the clause expressly provided that any dispute over the enforcement terms of the agreement would be brought in Illinois state court.

    The court dismissed arguments by Neopost that the dealership agreement, which did not have such a limiting forum selection clause, was controlling because: (1) nothing in the dealership agreement negated the settlement agreement’s forum selection clause; (2) the settlement agreement expressly provided that it superseded any conflicts with prior dealership agreements; and (3) Midwest’s action was to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement, not the dealership agreement.

    The case is No. 15 C 7752.

    Attorneys: Leonard A. Gail (Massey & Gail) and Robert C. Goldberg (Schoenberg, Fisher, Newman & Rosenberg, Ltd.) for Midwest Mailing & Shipping Systems, Inc. Michael Eidel (Fox Rothschild LLP) for Neopost USA Inc.

    Companies: Midwest Mailing & Shipping Systems, Inc.; Neopost USA Inc.

    Cases: FranchisingDistribution IllinoisNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use