Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • ANTITRUST—2d Cir.: Dismissal of eyewear antitrust class action over implausible market definitions affirmed
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Ill.: McDonald’s unable to avoid McRib suit
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST—9th Cir.: Late flag by Ninth Circuit reverses NFL’s win in ‘Sunday Ticket’ dispute,,new damages trial ordered
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. Pa.: Summary judgment denied drug manufacturers in Niaspan® pay-for-delay litigation
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. Tex.: ESG coal antitrust suit trimmed, but Iowa and Nebraska consumer claims survive
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—M.D. Fla.: Boxing-inspired fitness studio franchisees’ opposition to preliminary injunction knocked flat in evidentiary hearing
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—M.D. Fla.: Boxing-inspired fitness studio franchisees’ opposition to preliminary injunction knocked flat in evidentiary hearing, (Nov 2, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Lathrop GPM LLP | McGuire Law Offices, PA
    Organizations Mentioned:EB Rumble Franchising, LLC | Three South Tampa LLC

    By Justin Marcus Smith, J.D.

    Social media users’ posts were evidence of customer confusion, and the court concluded it did not need to consider whether the franchisees’ failure to remove themselves from “tagged” posts was a “use” under t ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use