Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—11th Cir.: Denial of class certification upheld in hospital’s tying claim against drug manufacturer
    • ADVERTISING—D.V.I.: Condo gripe website not commercial, could not support Lanham Act claim
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Antitrust enforcers support Apple’s compliance monitor in e-book price-fixing case
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Eastlink, Bruce Telecom to abandon merger: Canada Competition Bureau
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Japanese electronics manufacturers allegedly engaged in electrolytic capacitors price-fixing conspiracy
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. Cal.: Settlement squeezes $6.4 million from tomato products producers
    • ANTITRUST—S.D.N.Y.: “Mundane” E-Trade complaint failed to allege antitrust injury
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—8th Cir.: Slick move: Shell Oil dismissed after accountant disappears
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—E.D.N.C.: Treble damages and attorney fees assessed against Dairy Queen franchisee
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—W.D.N.C.: Former Meineke franchisee enjoined from operating competing car care center
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Center for Digital Democracy urges FTC to investigate Safe Harbor violations
    • RICO—N.D. Ill.: Abbott Labs dodges new Depakote® class action
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—E.D.N.C.: Treble damages and attorney fees assessed against Dairy Queen franchisee, (Aug 15, 2014)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Faegre & Benson, LLP | Smith Anderson Blount Dorsett Mitchell & Jernigan, LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:American Dairy Queen Corp. | American Dairy Queen Corporation, YS&J Enterprises, Inc. | Faegre & Benson | Smith Anderson Blount Dorsett Mitchell & Jernigan

    By Edward L. Puzzo, J.D.

    Diary Queen was entitled to treble damages, attorneys’ fees, and a permanent injunction based on its former franchisee’s continued trademark infringement and other franchise violations after entry of a preliminary injunction, the federa ...

    By Edward L. Puzzo, J.D.

    Diary Queen was entitled to treble damages, attorneys’ fees, and a permanent injunction based on its former franchisee’s continued trademark infringement and other franchise violations after entry of a preliminary injunction, the federal district court in Raleigh, North Carolina has ruled (American Dairy Queen Corporation v. YS&J Enterprises, Inc., August 14, 2014, Britt, W.).

    YS&L Enterprises and John Ribet operated a Diary Queen/Orange Julius franchise in Fayetteville, North Carolina. After the franchisees allegedly refused to cease operating their restaurant as required by the terms of their franchise agreement, franchisor Dairy Queen brought a lawsuit against the former franchisees on March 13, 2014, asserting claims for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. Defendants did not respond and, on April 2, 2014, the court issued a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from displaying Diary Queen trademarks at their location, distributing trademarked products, or otherwise operating the subject restaurant. On June 2, 2014, at a show cause hearing where defendant Ribet did appear, the court found the defendants in civil contempt for failing to abide by the preliminary injunction. All Dairy Queen signage and trademarks were removed from the store by June 8, 2014. Diary Queen then moved for a default judgment.

    Based on its earlier findings at the time of the preliminary injunction that Dairy Queen had shown a likelihood of success on the merits in its trademark infringement and breach of contract claims, the court ruled that Dairy Queen was entitled to default judgment on those claims, as well as the false designation of origin claim.

    Damages. Dairy Queen was entitled to damages sustained as a result of the defendants’ unauthorized use of trademarks. The court noted that, based on the requirement under the franchise agreement that the franchisee pays monthly licensing and sales promotion fees, defendants owed those fees for the period of January 21, 2014 through June 7, 2014 as actual damages. Further, the court found it appropriate to award treble the amount awarded as actual damages for the injury to Dairy Queen’s goodwill and reputation, given defendants’ “intentional and willful infringement.”

    Attorneys’ fees and injunction. The court also ruled that an award of attorneys’ fees against defendants was warranted, because the defendants ignored Dairy Queen’s cease and desist letters after termination of the franchise and continued their infringement after notice of this action, after issuance of the preliminary injunction, and after entry of default. Finally, the court converted the preliminary injunction to a permanent injunction, based on the defendants’ inaction in this case and the likelihood of continued infringement.

    The case is Civil Action No. 5:14-CV-151-BR.

    Attorneys: Isaac Augustin Linnartz (Smith Anderson Blount Dorsett Mitchell & Jernigan, LLP) and Kerry L. Bundy (Faegre & Benson, LLP) for American Dairy Queen Corporation.

    Companies: American Dairy Queen Corporation, YS&J Enterprises, Inc.

    Cases: FranchisingDistribution NorthCarolinaNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use