Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—9th Cir.: Overt acts to enforce licensing agreement tolled antitrust statute of limitations
    • ADVERTISING—W.D. Wash.: T-Mobile denied default judgment, granted permanent injunction against cell phone reseller
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: False statements plea follows misrepresentations to EPA over kickback conspiracy
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Generic drug manufacturer sues brand pharmaceutical maker Celgene for denying access for brand drug bioequivalence testing
    • ANTITRUST— D.N.J.: Roofing materials distributor allowed to amend antitrust complaint against Firestone and competing distributors
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal: Expert witness opinion admissible in part in employees’ antitrust action against high-tech companies
    • ANTITRUST—S.D. N.Y.: Building management systems products reseller fails to state plausible antitrust claims against competitor
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC files complaint against operator of Jerk.com website for deceiving consumers
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS: British Columbia Law Institute recommends enactment of franchise legislation
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION— Cal. App.: Successor corporation to private investigation franchisor properly added as judgment debtor
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION— Cal. App.: Successor corporation to private investigation franchisor properly added as judgment debtor, (Apr 7, 2014)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Lapidus & Lapidus
    Organizations Mentioned:LWI, Inc. | Lyons & Wolivar, Inc.

    By Edward L. Puzzo, J.D.

    A trial court properly amended a judgment, confirming an arbitration award against a private investigation franchisor, in order to add a successor corporation of the franchisor as a judgment debtor, the California Court of Appeals in Santa Ana has ru ...

    By Edward L. Puzzo, J.D.

    A trial court properly amended a judgment, confirming an arbitration award against a private investigation franchisor, in order to add a successor corporation of the franchisor as a judgment debtor, the California Court of Appeals in Santa Ana has ruled (Butler v. Lyons & Wolivar, Inc., April 3, 2014, Fybel, R.).

    From 2005 to 2009, Stephen Butler was a franchisee of Lyons & Wolivar, Inc., a franchisor of private investigation services. Butler sued Lyons, alleging various misrepresentations and breaches of the franchise agreement, and Lyons counterclaimed for unpaid royalties. Upon the petition of Lyons, the case was heard in arbitration. In September 2011, the arbitrator issued a final award, resulting in a net award of over $512,000 to former franchisee Butler.

    The trial court confirmed the arbitration award against franchisor Lyons & Wolivar, Inc, and later granted Butler’s motion to add LWI, Inc. as a judgment debtor. Butler had alleged that Lyons, a California corporation, had merged into LWI, a Nevada corporation.

    Additional judgment debtors. The court explained that a judgment can be amended to add additional judgment debtors when that person or entity is the alter ego or successor corporation of the original judgment debtor. The trial court had found that Butler had established by substantial evidenced that LWI was the successor of Lyons, it predecessor corporation

    The appellate court noted that LWI’s liability was not adjudged in the arbitration. However, Lyons and LWI had made many admissions that LWI had succeeded to and replaced Lyons, which would be sufficient to prove successor corporation liability in the absence of any other evidence, the appellate court ruled. Corporate filings also supported the trial court’s finding that LWI was properly added as a judgment debtor in the amended judgment. Thus, the appellate court affirmed the lower court’s ruling adding LWI as a judgment debtor.

    The case is Civil Action No. G047766.

    Attorneys: Daniel J. Koes for Lyons & Wolivar, Inc. and LWI, Inc. Daniel Craig Lapidus (Lapidus & Lapidus) for Steven S. Butler.

    Companies: Lyons & Wolivar, Inc.; LWI, Inc.

    Cases: FranchisingDistribution CaliforniaNews NevadaNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use