Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—D. Minn.: Food packaging manufacturer’s bundled discounts, sham litigation claims proceed
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: EC approves diabetes joint venture between Google’s sister company and Sanofi subsidiary
    • ANTITRUST—D. Tenn.: Direct purchasers’ expert testimony excluded in pool products price fixing suit
    • ANTITRUST—E.D.N.Y.: Law firm disqualification denied in Air Cargo Shipping case
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Alleged patent troll’s boycott, monopsonization claims against Samsung dismissed
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC actions lead to temporary halt of deceptive debt relief operations
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS: Nissan dealers claim preferred dealers’ incentives constitute price discrimination
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—3rd Cir.: Absent irreparable harm, former franchisees not barred from operating home care business
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—D. Colo: Red Robin unable to enjoin operation, require sale of franchise
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—3rd Cir.: Absent irreparable harm, former franchisees not barred from operating home care business, (Feb 24, 2016)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Hill Wallack LLP | Law Office of Louis H. Miron
    Organizations Mentioned:Executive Home Care Franchising LLC | Hill Wallack, LLP | Marks & Klein, LLP | Marshall Health Corp. | Well Being Home Care Corp.

    A federal district court properly denied an in-home care franchisor’s request for a preliminary injunction against former franchisees’ operation of a home care business based on the franchisor’s failure to show that it would suff ...

    A federal district court properly denied an in-home care franchisor’s request for a preliminary injunction against former franchisees’ operation of a home care business based on the franchisor’s failure to show that it would suffer irreparable harm absent the injunction. The U.S. Court of Appeals in Philadelphia upheld the district court’s order (Executive Home Care Franchising LLC v. Marshall Health Corp., February 23, 2016, Cowen, R.).

    In February of 2013, Clint, Massare, and Greer Marshall entered into a franchise agreement with Executive Home Care Franchising LLC to operate an in-home health care business. They subsequently abandoned the franchise in January of 2015. Executive Care responded by filing suit and an application for injunctive relief to enjoin the former franchisees from: (1) continuing to operate its franchise; (2) operating a competing, independent in-home care business; (3) violating the non-disclosure, non-competition, and non-solicitation clauses of the franchise agreement; and (4) using proprietary material, trademarks, trade names, or trade dress.

    The federal district court in Newark, New Jersey denied Executive Care’s motion for injunctive relief after Executive Care failed to show that it would suffer irreparable harm if injunctive relief was denied. The appellate court affirmed the federal district court’s decision, noting that the former franchisees: (1) had returned documents, stationary, marketing materials, and other items to Executive Care; (2) were no longer operating out of the franchised location; (3) were no longer using Executive Care’s mark or trade name; (4) were working to transfer the telephone number back to Executive Care; and (5) had informed their existing clients that they were no longer associated with the Executive Care system.

    The case is No. 15-1887.

    Attorneys: Evan M. Goldman (Hill Wallack LLP) and Justin M. Klein (Marks & Klein, LLP) for Executive Home Care Franchising LLC. Louis H. Miron (Law Office of Louis H. Miron) for Marshall Health Corp., Well Being Home Care Corp. and Clint Marshall.

    Companies: Executive Home Care Franchising LLC; Marshall Health Corp.; Well Being Home Care Corp.

    Cases: FranchisingDistribution DelawareNews NewJerseyNews PennsylvaniaNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use