Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—D. N.J.: Claims of bid-rigging in New Jersey real estate tax auctions may proceed
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: Antitrust Division seeks to block advertiser National Cinemedia’s acquisition of Screenvision
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: Florida sues to stop combination of two largest outpatient surgery center operators
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: Surgery Center Holding’s $792M acquisition of Symbion conditioned on divestiture
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: Substantiation claims against dietary supplement could not be brought in private action
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Commissioner Ohlhausen dissents from AmeriGas, Blue Rhino consent agreements
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Former Alabama real estate investor pleads guilty to mail fraud conspiracy
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: High Court will not consider judicial recusal dispute in monopolization case
    • ANTITRUST—D.N.J.: End-Payor class claims dismissed in Lipitor suit
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. Mich.: Predatory pricing claims against Chinese solar panel makers fail
    • ANTITRUST—W.D. Wash.: Claim that NFL playoff ticketing policy was anticompetitive tossed
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—2d Cir.: Fuel distributor entitled to terminate franchise for outstanding payments
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Paul Hastings welcomes antitrust attorney Ashley Winton to London office
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—2d Cir.: Fuel distributor entitled to terminate franchise for outstanding payments, (Nov 3, 2014)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Harfenist Kraut & Perlstein LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Barr & Morgan | NY Fuel Distributors, LLC | Yonkers Central Ave. Snack Mart, Inc.

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    NY Fuel Distributors, LLC properly terminated its franchise agreement with Yonkers Central Ave. Snack Mart, Inc., after Yonkers payments to NY Fuel Distributors fell into arrears, the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York City has decided. In affirming t ...

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    NY Fuel Distributors, LLC properly terminated its franchise agreement with Yonkers Central Ave. Snack Mart, Inc., after Yonkers payments to NY Fuel Distributors fell into arrears, the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York City has decided. In affirming the lower court’s order denying preliminary injunction to Yonkers, the appellate court determined that a franchisee’s failure to pay all sums a franchisor is legally entitled to, is an enumerated ground for termination under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA) (Yonkers Central Ave. Snack Mart, Inc. v. NY Fuel Distributors, LLC, October 31, 2014, Per Curiam).

    Yonkers appealed a district court’s October 3, 2013 order, denying the company preliminary injunction that would bar termination of its agreement with NY Fuel. According to the appellate court, the primary issue in this case was whether NY Fuel could terminate its agreement under the PMPA, after Yonkers fell into arrears.

    The PMPA states that a court “shall” grant preliminary injunction if a franchisee shows: (1) the franchise of which he is a party has been terminated; (2) there exists sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make such questions a fair ground for litigation; and (3) the court determines that, on balance, the hardships imposed upon the franchisor by the issuance of such preliminary injunctive relief will be less than the hardship which would be imposed upon such franchisee if such preliminary injunctive relief were not granted.

    The court ultimately determined that the lower court did not abuse its discretion, as failure “by the franchisee to pay to the franchisor in a timely manner when due all sums to which the franchisor is legally entitled” is an enumerated ground for termination under the PMPA. Because there was no dispute that Yonkers’ payments were in arrears, NY Fuel was entitled to terminate the relationship. As such, the lower court’s decision denying preliminary injunction was affirmed.

    The case number is 13-3841-cv.

    Attorneys: John J. Morgan (Barr & Morgan) for Yonkers Central Ave. Snack Mart, Inc. Jonathan D. Kraut and Neil Torczyner (Harfenist Kraut & Perlstein LLP) for NY Fuel Distributors, LLC.

    Companies: Yonkers Central Ave. Snack Mart, Inc.; NY Fuel Distributors, LLC

    Cases: FranchisingDistribution ConnecticutNews NewYorkNews VermontNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use