Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—7th Cir.: Shuttle truck drivers exempt from overtime requirements of FLSA because of Motor Carrier Exemption
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—S.D. Ill.: Female coach passed over in favor of male with no softball coaching experience takes Title VII claim to trial
    • DOL NEWS—Agency seeks contractor to accelerate integration of AI skills into Registered Apprenticeship programs
    • EEOC NEWS—New suits target religious and disability non-accommodation, as well as sexual harassment
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Major Biometric Win for Business in Illinois: 3 Lessons as Federal Appeals Court Says BIPA Damages Limit Applies Retroactively to Pending Cases
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Sweeping Changes to the New Jersey Family Leave Act Take Effect July 17, 2026
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—OSHA seeks removal of compliance deadline on adding safety measures to fixed ladders over 24 feet
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • NLRB NEWS—Advice memo analyzes CBA harassment language under Section 7 standards
    • NLRB NEWS—Social media post including internal, password-protected link, not protected, agency says in advice memo
    • PRIVACY—S.D.N.Y.: DOGE agent anonymity rejected in challenge to OPM data access
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—D. Ariz.: Rule 11 sanctions imposed on employee’s counsel for use of fabricated citations, quotations
    • STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES—Top labor and employment developments for March 2026
    • TORT CLAIMS—E.D. Wash.: College faculty member, accused of ‘blatant racial profiling,’ partially advances defamation claim
    • VITAL BRIEFING—One-third of importers to wait indefinitely for tariff refunds per U.S. customs agency
    • WORTH NOTING—Cases of note dealing with wage and hour issues
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, FEDERAL REGULATIONS—OSHA seeks removal of compliance deadline on adding safety measures to fixed ladders over 24 feet, (Apr 3, 2026)

    Organizations Mentioned:American Chemistry Council | American Petroleum Institute

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    The proposed change comes at the request of organizations representing fuel and petroleum companies.

    After several industry membership organizations submitted a petition requesting that OSHA repeal or revise aspects of the agency’s 2016 Walking ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    The proposed change comes at the request of organizations representing fuel and petroleum companies.

    After several industry membership organizations submitted a petition requesting that OSHA repeal or revise aspects of the agency’s 2016 Walking-Working Surfaces rule related to fixed ladders and personal fall arrest systems, OSHA has proposed to remove the November 18, 2036, compliance deadline that would have required employers to retrofit all fixed ladders taller than 24 feet with personal fall arrest systems or ladder safety systems. OSHA received the petition from member companies of the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), American Chemistry Council (ACC), and American Petroleum Institute (API).

    Under the proposal, which is scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on April 6, existing fixed ladders that already have cages or wells could continue to be used until they are replaced or reach the end of their useful life, rather than employers being required to upgrade them by a fixed date. The proposal would not change current requirements for new fixed ladders or for ladders or ladder sections that are replaced; those would still be required to have personal fall arrest systems or ladder safety systems.

    Repeal or revise? However, OSHA is also seeking comment on whether it should go further and repeal or revise the requirement that employers use personal fall arrest systems on all fixed ladders over 24 feet tall, instead permitting continued use of ladder cages or wells. OSHA preliminarily concludes that removing the retrofit deadline would provide employers with greater flexibility and avoid costly retrofits while maintaining worker safety protections, and it is asking the public for input on whether cages and wells provide equivalent safety outcomes compared to personal fall arrest or ladder safety systems.

    Impact? In the 2016 final rule, OSHA estimated that the Walking-Working Surfaces standard would prevent 11.4 ladder-related fatalities and 2,161 ladder-related lost-workday injuries per year across all ladder types. OSHA states that it is unable to determine whether any of those avoided fatalities or injuries would be attributable to the limited subset of fixed ladders affected by this proposal during the period after 2036, but it expects any safety impact from removing the deadline to be small.

    Comments are due 60 days after publication of the proposal. The docket number is OSHA-2025-0072.

    News: FederalRegulations Safety AgencyNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use