Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • SUPREME COURT NEWS—Court issues decision on Trump’s tariffs
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—N.D. Ill.: Employee called ‘hey, you Indian’ and ‘red dot’ Indian by supervisor loses on summary judgment
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEXUAL HARASSMENT—E.D. Mich.: Dealership employee, allegedly sexually assaulted in 2021-22, failed to preserve those claims
    • EEOC NEWS—New lawsuits challenge unlawful exclusions: Men from employer-sponsored event and black employees from breakroom
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Kansas lawmakers propose non-compete ban for healthcare professionals: employer takeaways + three steps to prepare
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Virginia employers face major workplace policy shifts under new gov't leadership: how to prepare now
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—Homeland Security has proposed changes for employment authorizations based on pending asylum applications
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—MSPB amends regs reflecting removal of certain appeal rights from MSPB jurisdiction
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LABOR—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES—NLRB.: Employer proved that requested information regarding parking delays did not exist
    • PROCEDURE—11th Cir.: Flight attendant won’t face sanctions for untimely claims against coworker who outed her as January 6 participant
    • RETALIATION—N.D. Ill.: Suspended employee’s suit under Title VII and ADEA may not proceed to trial
    • SENATE NEWS—Warren, other Senators seek answers on OSHA’s downward enforcement trend
    • STATE-LAW CLAIMS—D. Mass.: Amazon applicant advances claims under state’s lie detector statute
    • TORT CLAIMS—N.D. Cal.: Dismissal granted in pharmaceutical trade secrets dispute
    • VITAL BRIEFING—Trump announces new Japanese investments in U.S. infrastructure, credits own tariff policy
    • WORTH NOTING—Federal appeals court cases of note
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, FEDERAL REGULATIONS—MSPB amends regs reflecting removal of certain appeal rights from MSPB jurisdiction, (Feb 20, 2026)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    This completes the reversal of actions taken under the Biden administration in 2024.

    Closing the loop started by OPM earlier this month, MSPB has now announced a final rule amending its regulations to remove rights to appeal to MSPB for actions relate ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    This completes the reversal of actions taken under the Biden administration in 2024.

    Closing the loop started by OPM earlier this month, MSPB has now announced a final rule amending its regulations to remove rights to appeal to MSPB for actions related to placement or movement of a civil service employee into an excepted service position without civil service protection. This rule is intended to reflect OPM’s rescission of those rights.

    Where it started. In 2024, following notice and comment on a proposed rule, OPM issued a final rule, 5 CFR 302.603, which conferred jurisdiction on MSPB to hear appeals from: (1) federal employees moved from the competitive service into the excepted service, or moved between schedules in the excepted service, when the agency asserts that the employee would lose appeal rights, competitive status, or other previously accrued protections as a result of that move; and (2) an agency’s failure to provide required notice to the employee regarding whether the move would affect the employee’s appeal rights, competitive status, or other accrued protections. At the same time, after notice and comment, MSPB amended 5 CFR 1201.3 to reflect MSPB’s new jurisdiction over the appeal rights conferred by OPM’s rule, 5 CFR 302.603. MSPB’s amendment was codified at 5 CFR 1201.3(a)(12).

    On February 6, 2026, OPM rescinded 5 CFR 302.603, which had conferred jurisdiction on MSPB to hear those employee appeal rights. In this final rule, MSPB announces amendment of 5 CFR 1201.3 to reflect the same removal of these appeal rights, and mirror OPM’s new rules, which rescinded the previously codified basis for MSPB jurisdiction.

    News: FederalRegulations PublicEmployees Procedure

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use