Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • PROCEDURE—8th Cir.: Walz, other Minnesota officials immune from suit challenging state’s anti-captive audience law
    • DISCRIMINATION—E.D. Mich.: Family Dollar director, taunted about age and weight, advances age-based claims related to his termination
    • EEOC NEWS—Buffalo Wild Wings restaurant pays $47K to resolve alleged religious discrimination; applicant with long skirt rejected
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Four things you may not know about. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Littler's Workplace Policy Institute presents: Labor Day Report—2025
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—Comment deadline extended on Labor department’s proposal to rescind regulations related to E.O. 11246
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Judge recommends Rule 11 sanctions for attorney in employment case whose brief cited non-existent cases
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Lawsuit challenges inclusion of NWS, U.S. PTO Office in national security executive order
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Union files challenge on behalf of Patent Office employees whose bargaining rights are impacted by latest EO
    • PROCEDURE—N.D. Ohio: No associational standing in suit alleging HHS’s failure to enforce ACA non-discrimination provision
    • WAGE-HOUR—MINIMUM WAGE—S.D. Ohio: Tipped employees prevail as to employer’s liability for dual jobs claim
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—7th Cir.: AbbVie salesperson cannot revive FCA claim concerning off-label prescription sales push
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—D.D.C.: Whistleblower’s allegation of D.C. Retirement Board’s retaliatory termination under Dodd-Frank survives challenge
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, FEDERAL REGULATIONS—Comment deadline extended on Labor department’s proposal to rescind regulations related to E.O. 11246, (Sep 4, 2025)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Regulations promulgated under Executive Order 11246 prohibited certain Federal contractors and subcontractors from engaging in employment discrimination.

    At the beginning of July, the Labor Department published in the Federal Register its plans to imp ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Regulations promulgated under Executive Order 11246 prohibited certain Federal contractors and subcontractors from engaging in employment discrimination.

    At the beginning of July, the Labor Department published in the Federal Register its plans to implement Executive Order 14173, which revoked Executive Order 11246, under which regulations prohibited Federal contractors and subcontractors from engaging in employment discrimination. It also set forth certain affirmative obligations. The regulations also, with some exceptions, prohibited those employers from taking adverse employment actions against applicants or employees because they inquired about, discussed, or disclosed information about their pay or their co-workers’ pay.

    The proposed rule would rescind those regulations, as identified.

    The deadline for comments on the proposed rule, originally set for September 2, 2025, has now been extended and now will end on September 17, 2025. So far there are over 360 comments on Regulations.gov.

    News: FederalRegulations GovernmentContracts Discrimination AgencyNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use