Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—7th Cir.: Neurosurgeon, hired at 75, fired three years later, failed to show discrimination
    • ARBITRATION—N.D. Cal.: Gaming company product manager must arbitrate harassment, retaliation, and wage claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—Fla. Dist. App.: County entitled to judgment in firefighter’s medical marijuana suit
    • DISCRIMINATION—PREGNANCY—W.D. Wis.: Former municipal police officer's pregnancy discrimination, lactation, and GPS tracking claims rejected
    • DOL NEWS—Labor Department sues Washington beekeeping company, alleges widespread H-2A worker violations
    • EEOC NEWS—Agency sues Atlanta-area plumbing company for alleged pregnancy discrimination
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Proposed Rule Would End EEOC Employer Demographic Reporting Requirements
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Too Little, Too Late? Third Circuit Clarifies ADA Notice Requirements & Reinforces Employers’ Right to Enforce Workplace Rules
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—OPM removes federal hiring guideline references from federal personnel regulations
    • LABOR—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES—NLRB: Employer’s bargaining proposal was not unlawful threat to punish baseless grievances
    • PROCEDURE—8th Cir.: Franchisee’s antitrust claim against Sears Hometown Store franchisor affirmed as barred compulsory counterclaim
    • PROCEDURE—W.D. Wash.: Motion to dismiss, dissolve preliminary injunction blocking termination of AFGE CBA denied
    • SENATE NEWS—Hearing examines AI’s effects on jobs, career pathways, and workforce data
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—Proposed Rule Would End EEOC Employer Demographic Reporting Requirements, (Jul 30, 2026)

    Organizations Mentioned:Foley Hoag | Foley Hoag, LLP

    By Christopher Feudo and Isabel Celio of Foley Hoag LLP

    Key Takeaways:

    • The EEOC has voted to rescind several of its rules mandating that employers report workplace demographic information, including the rule requiring the submission of EEO-1 reports.

    • The EEOC’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking will be p ...

    By Christopher Feudo and Isabel Celio of Foley Hoag LLP

    Key Takeaways:

    • The EEOC has voted to rescind several of its rules mandating that employers report workplace demographic information, including the rule requiring the submission of EEO-1 reports.

    • The EEOC’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking will be published in the Federal Register for public comment, and members of the public will have 30 days from publication to submit comments.

    • If the rule becomes final, covered employers will be relieved of obligation to file EEO-1 reports.

    On July 21, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) voted 2-1 to issue a proposed rule that would rescind the agency's long-standing annual workforce demographic reporting requirements, including the EEO-1 report required of many private employers. If finalized, the proposal would also eliminate similar reporting requirements for certain unions, state and local government entities, public schools, and other covered organizations.

    For decades, the EEOC has required covered employers and other entities to submit annual reports summarizing aggregate workforce data by race and sex. The EEO-1 report, in particular, has applied to private employers with at least 100 employees and certain federal contractors with at least 50 employees. In announcing the proposal, the Commission stated that the reports are not required by Title VII, impose substantial costs, and are not sufficiently tailored to the agency’s enforcement needs.

    The proposal is not final. The EEOC’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking will be published in the Federal Register for public comment, and members of the public will have 30 days from publication to submit comments. The agency has also scheduled a public hearing for August 11, 2026, with requests to testify due by August 7, 2026.

    If the rule becomes final, employers will be relieved from many reporting requirements mandated by the EEOC. However, employers should not assume that the proposal eliminates all demographic-data obligations. The EEOC has stated that its authority to request specific records in connection with charge investigations would remain unchanged. Employers should continue to monitor the rulemaking process, consider whether to submit comments, and maintain employment records needed to respond to discrimination charges, audits, or litigation.

    Christopher Feudo

    Isabel Celio

    Foley Hoag LLP

    Seaport West

    155 Seaport Boulevard

    Boston, MA US 02210-2600 United States

    Tel.: +1 617 8321000

    E-mail: amcneil@foleyhoag.com

    URL: www.foleyhoag.com/

    © Mondaq Ltd, 2026 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: Christopher Feudo and Isabel Celio (Foley Hoag).

    ExpertInsights: ExpertInsights FederalRegulations AgencyNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use