Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Coalition of unions, nonprofits, and local governments sue over ‘unconstitutional reorganization’ of federal government
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—E.D. Pa.: Public defender, fired after being placed on a PIP, cannot advance claim
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—E.D. La.: Fired laborer with narcolepsy could not perform essential job functions
    • EMPLOYEE LEAVE—E.D. Pa.: No evidence manufacturer interfered with employee’s rights or retaliated against her for requesting leave
    • EMPLOYEE LEAVE—S.D. Ohio: Recruiter plausibly alleged she was constructively discharged for requesting FMLA caretaker leave
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—OMB solicits public comment on eliminating regulations: A bold new frontier for OSHA may await
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Supreme Court ruling eases path for ERISA prohibited transaction claims
    • PENSION AND BENEFIT PLANS—N.D. Cal.: CMO, fired by Musk following Twitter acquisition and layoffs, stated ERISA claim
    • RETALIATION—D. Mass.: Teacher who told parents about student’s request to use new name/pronouns can’t advance First Amendment claim
    • WAGE-HOUR—E.D.N.Y.: Healthcare employer that rounded clock punch times cannot dismiss unpaid overtime claims
    • WHITE HOUSE NEWS—Executive Order requires CMV drivers to meet English proficiency rules
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—OMB solicits public comment on eliminating regulations: A bold new frontier for OSHA may await, (Apr 29, 2025)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Ogletree Deakins
    Organizations Mentioned:Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, PC | U.S. Department of Justice | U.S. Department of the Interior

    By John D. Surma of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

    Every safety professional has an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation he or she cannot stand, believes is a waste of time, energy, and/or money, or considers outdated and antiquated.

    Even the average person on the street pro ...

    By John D. Surma of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

    Every safety professional has an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation he or she cannot stand, believes is a waste of time, energy, and/or money, or considers outdated and antiquated.

    Even the average person on the street probably thinks there is some silly OSHA regulation that should be done away with. Now the aggrieved (even only the mildly annoyed) safety professional and individual has a chance to have that regulation eliminated, but only if they act soon.

    Quick Hits

    • OMB is seeking the public's input on deregulation, including public comment on and recommendations for potentially outdated or burdensome OSHA regulations, with a submission deadline of May 12, 2025.

    • Safety professionals and the public now have the opportunity to suggest the elimination or revision of specific OSHA regulations.

    • Potential targets for deregulation pursuant to OMB's request for information include OSHA's "walkaround rule," electronic recordkeeping regulations, and the proposed heat injury and illness prevention program.

    On April 11, 2025, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published a notice, titled, "Request for Information: Deregulation," soliciting the public's comments and deregulatory recommendations with respect to rescinding or replacing agency regulations, including OSHA rules. This request for information (RFI) is in keeping with the Trump administration's regulatory freeze issued at the outset of the president's term of office.

    On its face, the request for information (RFI) states that "OMB solicits ideas for deregulation from across the country. Commenters should identify rules to be rescinded and provide detailed reasons for their rescission. OMB invites comments about any and all regulations currently in effect." The RFI continues and states the following:

    OMB seeks proposals to rescind or replace regulations that stifle American businesses and American ingenuity. We seek comment from the public on regulations that are unnecessary, unlawful, unduly burdensome, or unsound. Comments should address the background of the rule and the reasons for the proposed rescission, with particular attention to regulations that are inconsistent with statutory text or the Constitution, where costs exceed benefits, where the regulation is outdated or unnecessary, or where regulation is burdening American businesses in unforeseen ways.

    Without any parameters or limitations on RFI submissions, it is possible that someone might recommend that all OSHA regulations be eliminated, that the construction standards (29 C.F.R. 1926) be eliminated, or that the recordkeeping requirements be eliminated. It is unlikely that any of these would take place, as the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act requires the agency to issue regulations and collect data concerning workplace injuries and illnesses.

    Section 2 of the OSH Act states:

    (b) The Congress declares it to be its purpose and policy, through the exercise of its powers to regulate commerce among the several States and with foreign nations and to provide for the general welfare, to assure so far as possible every working man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful working conditions and to preserve our human resources—

    (3) by authorizing the Secretary of Labor to set mandatory occupational safety and health standards applicable to businesses affecting interstate commerce, and by creating an Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission for carrying out adjudicatory functions under the Act[.]

    Section 24 of the OSH Act states:

    (a) In order to further the purposes of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall develop and maintain an effective program of collection, compilation, and analysis of occupational safety and health statistics. Such program may cover all employments whether or not subject to any other provisions of this Act but shall not cover employments excluded by section 4 of the Act. The Secretary shall compile accurate statistics on work injuries and illnesses which shall include all disabling, serious, or significant injuries and illnesses, whether or not involving loss of time from work, other than minor injuries requiring only first aid treatment and which do not involve medical treatment, loss of consciousness, restriction of work or motion, or transfer to another job.

    Consequently, OSHA is effectively obligated by the OSH Act to issue occupational safety and health standards to "assure so far as possible every working man and woman in the Nation [a] safe and healthful" workplace and to collect data concerning workplace safety and health matters. Seeking to eliminate all OSHA standards or recordkeeping rules would require revising the OSH Act.

    Which OSHA regulations are probable targets of these efforts? The so-called "walkaround rule" related to who can accompany an OSHA compliance officer during an inspection seems a very likely candidate. Similarly, the electronic recordkeeping regulations may be subject to deletion or elimination. To the extent that OSHA is seeking to implement a heat injury and illness prevention program, it, too, could fall prey to this RFI.

    There is no limit on the agency, regulation, or topic that may be submitted pursuant to the RFI. Undoubtedly, there will be an enormous number of suggestions related to OSHA and other agencies—from the U.S. Department of Justice's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, to the U.S. Department of the Interior's Bureau of Indian Affairs, to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (a federal agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)—to name but a few. Many suggestions will likely be dismissed out of hand, but there will also likely be well-reasoned, thoughtful submissions that do receive at least some attention. The deadline for submissions in response to the RFI is May 12, 2025, and submissions may be made through the website Regulations.gov.

    Ogletree Deakins' Workplace Safety and Health Practice Group will continue to monitor developments and provide updates on the Workplace Safety and Health blog as additional information becomes available. This article and more information on how the Trump administration's actions impact employers can be found on Ogletree Deakins' New Administration Resource Hub.

    The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    John D. Surma

    Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

    Peachtree Tower

    191 Peachtree St NW #4800,

    Atlanta

    GA 30308

    United States

    Tel.: +1 404 881-1300

    E-mail: client.services@ogletreedeakins.com

    URL: www.ogletree.com/

    (c) Mondaq Ltd., 2025 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: (Ogletree Deakins).

    ExpertInsights: Safety AgencyNews IndustryNewsTrends FederalRegulations

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use