Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—D.N.J.: Transgender servicemembers temporarily halt involuntary separation proceedings
    • ATTORNEYS’ FEES—7th Cir.: District court’s denial of attorneys’ fees to local union members in challenge to trusteeship not abuse of discretion
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—E.D. Pa.: White municipal employee denied promotion in favor of Black candidate advances reverse race bias claim
    • EEOC NEWS—Agency secures $850K from employers across three discrimination lawsuits
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Attention employers: EEOC Acting Chair requests information from 20 law firms regarding DEI-related employment practices
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—New York State Senate passes the No Severance Ultimatums Act
    • HOUSE NEWS—Raskin, Pallone ‘demand’ Trump reverse FTC Commissioner firings
    • IMMIGRATION NEWS—Economic Policy Institute’s state-specific fact sheets highlight economic benefits of immigrant workers
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—N.D. Ill.: Public defender’s First Amendment claim involving photo of herself with gun, Israeli flag advances
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—NAACP, NEA, and others file suit over dismantling of Education Department
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Trump administration applies to Supreme Court for stay to avoid reinstating federal workers
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—D. Md.: Education, OPM, Treasury preliminary enjoined from disclosing PPI to DOGE affiliates
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—New York State Senate passes the No Severance Ultimatums Act, (Mar 25, 2025)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Reavis Page Jump

    By Jill Kahn Marshall and Anna Beckelman of Reavis Page Jump LLP

    The New York State Senate recently passed Senate Bill S372, also known as the No Severance Ultimatums Act, which would add a new Section 215-d to the New York Labor Law in order to "ensure that all New Yorkers are provided protections when reviewing ...

    By Jill Kahn Marshall and Anna Beckelman of Reavis Page Jump LLP

    The New York State Senate recently passed Senate Bill S372, also known as the No Severance Ultimatums Act, which would add a new Section 215-d to the New York Labor Law in order to "ensure that all New Yorkers are provided protections when reviewing severance agreements, including providing ample time to review such agreements." Severance agreements typically ask employees to release important claims against their employers, and the Act's proponents contend they should not be forced to make this important decision under duress or without consulting an attorney.

    If passed by the State Assembly and signed into law, the Act would require employers to provide all employees a review period of 21 days for proposed severance agreements, along with a seven-day revocation period following their execution of such agreement. The severance agreement would not become effective until the expiration of this revocation period. An employee may sign a severance agreement prior to the conclusion of the 21-day review period, provided that the review period is waived knowingly and voluntary, and without fraud, misrepresentation, or threat by the employer. The Act also requires employers to notify employees offered a severance agreement that the employee has the right to consult an attorney regarding the agreement. The Act would provide this protection to all employees in New York State, with the exception of severance agreements negotiated under a collective bargaining agreement.

    The proposed law puts employees of all ages on equal footing with those who are 40 or older, who are already afforded these protections under the federal Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBFA), where the severance agreement requires a release of claims under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). This protection for older workers has created a somewhat arbitrary distinction, where workers releasing federal age discrimination claims are afforded a reasonable review and revocation period for such agreements, but younger employees who are being asked to release claims under other laws are not. Some employers exploit the lack of protection for younger workers by forcing them to decide whether to sign a severance agreement over an unreasonably short or inconvenient period of time. Other employers voluntarily chose to provide employees under 40 with the same 21-day review and seven-day revocation period in order to maintain uniformity amongst their workforce.

    The Act will next go to a vote in the New York State Assembly. Employers should take note that if passed in the Assembly and signed by Governor Kathy Hochul, the Act goes into effect immediately, and New York employers will be required to comply with its provisions with respect to severance agreements provided to employees as of that date.

    The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Jill Kahn Marshall and Anna Beckelman

    Reavis Page Jump LLP

    41 Madison Avenue

    41st Floor

    New York, NY

    10010

    United States

    Tel.: +1 212 763 4100

    E-mail: Jmarshall@rpjlaw.com

    URL: www.rpjlaw.com/

    (c) Mondaq Ltd., 2025 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: (Reavis Page Jump).

    ExpertInsights: StateLegislation Discharge Layoffs PracticeTip

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use