Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • NLRB NEWS—Board now has a quorum with two new members sworn in
    • DISCRIMINATION—9th Cir.: Preliminary injunction enjoining enforcement of WLAD against religious organization that hires co-religionists affirmed
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—M.D. Pa.: Decisionmakers’ alleged remarks reflecting pre-firing concern about employee’s age bolsters ADEA claim
    • DISCRIMINATION—E.D. La.: Salesperson, terminated after alleged performance issues, fails to advance various claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—4th Cir.: African-American police officer, fired after bachelorette party altercation, stated race discrimination claim
    • EEOC NEWS—Agency sues employers over failure to comply with ADA, ADEA, Title VII, PWFA non-discrimination mandates
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Back in Business: EEOC’s Restored Quorum Explained and a Look Forward to 2026
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—New Weighted Selection Process for H-1B Cap Lottery Set to Take Effect in 2026
    • FDIC NEWS—OIG closes investigations into allegations of misconduct, fraud within organization
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—DOL rescinds WIOA guidance construing ‘because of... sex’ in Title IX to include transgender status and gender identity
    • LABOR—ARBITRATION—Union president’s Discord post found to incite prohibited work stoppage
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Union sues Texas ed agency alleging baseless investigations of educators after Kirk assassination
    • ON THE LABOR FRONT—New York’s Purported NLRA Preemption Circumvention Thwarted. Is California’s Next?
    • PENSION AND BENEFIT PLANS—9th Cir.: Employer avoids withdrawal liability for pension contributions since MPPAA’s entertainment exception applied
    • RETALIATION—W.D. La.: EEOC proved retaliation against Black employee who complained her supervisor asked if she attended BLM protests
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—New Weighted Selection Process for H-1B Cap Lottery Set to Take Effect in 2026, (Jan 7, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney
    Organizations Mentioned:Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PC

    By Christopher R. Thorn and Stephanie Ng of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC

    On December 29, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a final rule that replaces the current H-1B random lottery process with a weighted selection system designed to favor beneficiaries with higher wages, as determined by the Depa ...

    By Christopher R. Thorn and Stephanie Ng of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC

    On December 29, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a final rule that replaces the current H-1B random lottery process with a weighted selection system designed to favor beneficiaries with higher wages, as determined by the Department of Labor’s (DOL) four-tier prevailing wage system. This final rule takes effect on February 27, 2026, meaning it will be in place for the upcoming cap lottery in March 2026 for H-1B petitions with start dates in the Fiscal Year 2027.

    Overview of the New Rule

    Under the revised system, the selection of H-1B beneficiaries registered for the cap will be determined by a weighted pool, with entries based on the offered wage relative to the DOL's Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) four-tier prevailing wage system:

    • Beneficiaries offered a Level 4 wage (highest) will be entered into the pool four times.

    • Level 3 wage offers will result in three entries.

    • Level 2 wage offers will include two entries.

    • Level 1 wage offers will qualify for a single entry.

    Employers registering prospective H-1B employees will need to specify the appropriate occupational code, the OEWS wage level and the area of employment. When a registration is selected, the employer must submit the corresponding documentation during the petition process to verify that the wage level indicated in the registration was appropriate for the position.

    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) retains discretion to deny or revoke petitions if it determines that an employer attempted to manipulate the odds by selecting an inappropriate wage level or offering a lower wage than initially registered. Nonetheless, the regulation acknowledges that changes in work location—if bona fide—may be permissible, even if they result in a lower wage level.

    Wage Offerings and Wage Levels

    The registration process will reflect the OEWS wage level associated with the wage offered to the prospective employee. Employers must select the highest wage level that the offered wage meets or exceeds for the relevant occupation and location. If the employee will work in multiple locations, the lowest wage level among those locations must be chosen.

    It’s important to note that the wage level indicated in the registration is based on the offered wage, not the wage level used for the Labor Condition Application (LCA), which is primarily determined by the position’s educational and experience requirements, as guided by DOL regulations. This means even if a job offer would otherwise be classified as level I under the OEWS wage level structure for LCA purposes based on the requirements of the position, the beneficiary could still be assigned to a higher equivalent wage level based on a high salary for registration purposes.

    Implications for Employers

    This policy shift could impact employers' hiring strategies, especially for entry-level candidates at Level 1 wages, who may face reduced chances of selection. To improve their odds, employers may offer higher wages, which could lead to increased labor costs and potential shifts in hiring practices. While the DHS intends for the rule to be in effect for the FY 2027 season, it is possible that the regulation will be challenged in federal court, which could delay its implementation. Importantly, this rule does not affect “cap-exempt” H-1B petitions, including extensions of stay, change of employer, amendments, or initial H-1B petitions filed by organizations that are deemed to be not liable for the H-1B annual cap.

    Conclusion

    The upcoming change to a weighted H-1B lottery represents a significant shift in how H-1B visa applicants are selected, favoring higher-paid beneficiaries and potentially reshaping employer hiring strategies. Stakeholders should monitor developments closely and adapt their processes accordingly to navigate this evolving landscape effectively. Our team continues to closely monitor the progress of this regulation. Please contact our Immigration team members if you have any questions.

    The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Christopher R. Thorn

    Stephanie Ng

    Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC

    Union Trust Building

    501 Grant Street

    Suite 200

    Pittsburgh, PA 15219-4413 United States

    Tel.: +1 412 562 8800

    E-mail: shari.boyle@bipc.com

    URL: www.bipc.com/

    © Mondaq Ltd, 2026 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: Christopher R. Thorn and Stephanie Ng (Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney).

    ExpertInsights: ExpertInsights Immigration FederalRegulations WageHour

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use