Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—4th Cir.: Preliminary injunction barring Education, OPM, Treasury from disclosing PPI to DOGE affiliates vacated
    • ARBITRATION—D. Minn.: FAA’s transportation worker exemption did not apply to regional retail-store manager
    • CONTRACT CLAIMS—4th Cir.: Financial advisors who left employer to start their own firm properly subject to preliminary injunction; but not new firm
    • DISCRIMINATION—7th Cir.: White employee, suspended for policy violations, suspected FMLA abuse, cannot revive lawsuit
    • DOL NEWS—Report outlines strategic pillars for federal government’s approach to workforce development
    • EEOC NEWS—Workplace harassment, retaliation claims end in settlements
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—10 steps mine operators should take as overtime class/collective actions surge across the country
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—California Court of Appeal clarifies sick leave calculation for outside sales employees
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—W.D. Va.: Demotion of administrative assistant may have violated due process
    • RETALIATION—S.D. Ohio: U.S. Bank officers, fired after reorganization, fail to show complaint motivated decision
    • SUPREME COURT NEWS—Argument scheduled for November in suit over injured soldier’s claims against military contractor
    • TORT CLAIMS—E.D. Va.: Issue preclusion barred trade secret misappropriation suit
    • WAGE-HOUR—MINIMUM WAGE—9th Cir.: J.B. Hunt’s piece-rate driver pay plan complied with California Labor Code
    • WHITE HOUSE NEWS—Smithsonian museums will now undergo ‘comprehensive internal review’ to ‘ensure alignment’ with President’s vision
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—California Court of Appeal clarifies sick leave calculation for outside sales employees, (Aug 13, 2025)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Jackson Lewis
    Organizations Mentioned:Charter Communications | Jackson Lewis, PC

    By Shannon Nakabayashi of Jackson Lewis P.C.

    A recent California Court of Appeal decision provides clarity for employers with commissioned outside sales employees. In Hirdman v. Charter Communications, the court confirmed that employers may calculate paid sick leave for outside salespersons usi ...

    By Shannon Nakabayashi of Jackson Lewis P.C.

    A recent California Court of Appeal decision provides clarity for employers with commissioned outside sales employees. In Hirdman v. Charter Communications, the court confirmed that employers may calculate paid sick leave for outside salespersons using their base hourly pay, excluding commissions, as long as that's how they calculate other forms of paid leave.

    Bradley Hirdman, a former outside salesperson for Charter Communications, sued the company under California's Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), claiming he was not paid correctly for sick leave. He argued that commissioned outside salespeople like him should be considered "nonexempt employees" when it comes to calculating sick leave, which would require factoring in commissions into the pay rate.

    Charter disagreed, stating that Hirdman was an "exempt employee" under the Labor Code's outside salesperson exemption, and that it properly used his base hourly rate (excluding commissions) to calculate his sick pay, just as it did for vacation or other paid time off.

    The trial court sided with Charter, and the Court of Appeal has now affirmed that decision.

    The court found the law's language to be clear: "Exempt employees" includes all those exempt from overtime rules, including outside salespeople.

    The court rejected the argument that the term "exempt" should be limited to executive, administrative, or professional employees. It also declined to rely on a non-binding opinion letter from the Labor Commissioner's office that supported Hirdman's view, noting that the letter did not reflect a long-standing or formal agency interpretation.

    The Court of Appeal held that employers should use the paid sick leave calculation method described in Labor Code section 246(l)(3), pertaining to exempt employees. That method simply requires employers to calculate sick pay the same way they calculate other types of paid leave. The court's decision simplifies the payroll process for certain commissioned employees and helps ensure consistency.

    The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Shannon Nakabayashi

    Jackson Lewis P.C.

    666 3rd Ave 28th Floor

    New York

    NY 10017

    United States

    Tel.: +1 212 545 4000

    E-mail: myupdates@jacksonlewis.com

    URL: www.jacksonlewis.com/

    (c) Mondaq Ltd, 2025 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: (Jackson Lewis).

    ExpertInsights: ExpertInsights EmployeeLeave StateLawClaims CaliforniaNews PracticeTip

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use