Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—D.C. Cir.: Administration granted emergency stay against reinstatement of fired members of NLRB, MSPB
    • COVERAGE, LIABILITY—1st Cir.: Judge who made unwelcome sexual advances toward treatment counselor not entitled to qualified immunity
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Attention California employers: New law allows employers to seek workplace violence restraining orders based on harassment
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Crackdown on antisemitism in education is not just limited to students
    • LABOR NEWS—Union did not violate NLRA by demanding arbitration under pre-hire labor peace agreement
    • LABOR—UNFIAR LABOR PRACTICES—NLRB: Existing Board precedent barred finding that Starbucks disciplined employee without union notice
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Court declines to stay preliminary injunction pending government appeal in suit over PPI
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Fifth Circuit panel vacates prior opinion in suit over Biden’s federal contractor wage order
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Lawsuits brought by two more law firms targeted in Trump EOs bring restraining orders
    • ON THE LABOR FRONT—Can the National Labor Relations Board be even more partisan?
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—S.D.N.Y.: Federal judge blocks attempted dismantling of U.S. Agency for Global Media
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—4th Cir.: Musk, DOGE awarded stay of preliminary injunction barring them from dismantling USAID
    • WAGE-HOUR—MINIMUM WAGE—N.D. Ohio: Restaurant employees entitled to damages after performing non-tip-producing tasks
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—Attention California employers: New law allows employers to seek workplace violence restraining orders based on harassment, (Mar 31, 2025)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Nukk-Freeman & Cerra
    Organizations Mentioned:Labor Relations

    By Melanie Ghaw of Nukk-Freeman & Cerra

    California employers will no longer have to wait until harassment escalates into unlawful violence or a credible threat of violence to protect their employees. Thanks to a new law, effective as of January 1, 2025, employers may now seek a temporary r ...

    By Melanie Ghaw of Nukk-Freeman & Cerra

    California employers will no longer have to wait until harassment escalates into unlawful violence or a credible threat of violence to protect their employees. Thanks to a new law, effective as of January 1, 2025, employers may now seek a temporary restraining order (TRO) on behalf of an employee based solely on the act of harassment. The relevant law amends the California Code of Civil Procedure to add "harassment" as an additional standalone basis for employers to seek a TRO and injunction on behalf of an employee and, if appropriate, other employees at the workplace (see HERE).

    Before January 1, 2025, employers could seek a TRO only if an individual (1) "assaulted, battered, or stalked" the employee, or (2) "made a credible threat of violence against the employee" by making knowing and willful statements, or engaging in a course of conduct, that would cause a reasonable person to fear for their safety or their family's safety.

    As of January 1, 2025, employers may seek a TRO based solely on the occurrence of "harassment," defined as "a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, or harasses the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose." The law specifies that such conduct must "cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress and must actually cause substantial emotional distress."

    Under the law, employees for whom a TRO is sought have the right to remain anonymous. The law also prohibits courts from issuing TROs that infringe on speech or activities protected by the Constitution, the National Labor Relations Act, or other applicable laws.

    Employer Takeaways

    Among the benefits offered, the law allows employers to take proactive steps to protect their workforce based on harassment alone, simplifies the legal process to obtain a TRO, and improves workplace safety and morale. To leverage these benefits, employers should:

    • Inform employees about the expanded protections under the law;

    • Update workplace policies to reflect these new protections;

    • Explore whether a TRO is appropriate when addressing complaints of harassment; and

    • Train appropriate personnel on new protections and considerations under the law.

    The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Melanie Ghaw

    Nukk-Freeman & Cerra

    26 Main Street

    Suite 202

    Chatham

    New Jersey

    07928

    United States

    Tel.: +1 973 665 9100

    E-mail:

    URL: www.nfclegal.com/

    (c) Mondaq Ltd., 2025 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: (Nukk-Freeman & Cerra).

    ExpertInsights: StateLegislation Safety IndustryNewsTrends PracticeTip

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use