Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • AGENCY NEWS—OPM issues guidance on RIFs reversed by Continuing Appropriations Act
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—D. Utah: Amazon’s safety-violation rationale insufficient to defeat age discrimination claim
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—W.D. Va.: City’s termination of epileptic IT worker survives ADA and whistleblower challenges
    • DISCRIMINATION—RETALIATION—W.D. Mich.: Custodial employee was fired for performance issues, not pregnancy
    • EEOC NEWS—Chicken restaurant will pay $300K to settle sexual harassment claims
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Back online and on alert: what employers must do now as the government shutdown ends
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Employers should revisit their non-compete agreements after latest Massachusetts Superior Court ruling
    • FEDERAL LEGISLATION—Senate bill aims to restrict labor unions’ use of employees’ personal info
    • LABOR—UNIONS, UNION MEMBERS—C.D. Ill.: 64-year-old African-American laborer adequately alleged that union discriminated in job referrals
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Government contractor alleges he was fired for Facebook post about Charlie Kirk
    • PROCEDURE—D. Mass.: Court adopts bifurcated approach to jurisdictional question regarding canceled teacher training grants
    • VITAL BRIEFING—Bessent teases tariff rollbacks; says ‘substantial announcements’ in next days
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EEOC NEWS—Chicken restaurant will pay $300K to settle sexual harassment claims, (Nov 14, 2025)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Slim Chickens failed to remedy multiple of complaints of harassment from young female workers involving the same shift manager.

    In its first indication of results since the shutdown ended, yesterday the EEOC announced that it had reached a settlement ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Slim Chickens failed to remedy multiple of complaints of harassment from young female workers involving the same shift manager.

    In its first indication of results since the shutdown ended, yesterday the EEOC announced that it had reached a settlement with Simply Slims, L.L.C., doing business as Slim Chickens, whereby the employer will pay $300,000 and provide other relief to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the federal agency.

    Unresolved complaints about manager. Slim Chickens, based out of Arkansas, has more than 200 locations, and franchisee operator Simply Slims, L.L.C. owns 13 locations in Arkansas, including the one implicated by the agency’s lawsuit. According to that suit, the company received two complaints of sexual harassment by a shift manager at the Hot Springs location by April 2022, but it made no move to remedy the concerns. In July, four more young female workers complained of sexual harassment by the same shift manager.

    Money, policy, training. The EEOC filed suit after first trying to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its administrative conciliation process. Now, a federal judge has entered the two-year consent decree resolving the charge. In addition to the $300,000 monetary payment, the settlement requires the employer to revise and distribute its sexual harassment policy and provide sexual harassment training to all employees for two years.

    “As young people step into today’s work environment, many continue to experience harassment,” said Faye Williams, regional attorney for EEOC’s Memphis District Office. “This case sends a clear message to employers: the EEOC is steadfast in its commitment to eliminating discrimination and ensuring that all workers are protected from harassment in the workplace.”

    The lawsuit was filed in the Western District of Arkansas; the case is No. 6:23-cv-06090.

    News: AgencyNews Discrimination SexualHarassment RemediesDamages

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use