Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • PROCEDURE—U.S.: States may not immunize officials from Section 1983 claims on administrative exhaustion grounds
    • AGENCY NEWS—Federal workforce purge continues per questionable OPM mandate; unions file new lawsuit
    • ARBITRATION—Cal App.: Employer did not waive arbitration, was not required to initiate the process
    • DISCRIMINATION—PREGNANCY—8th Cir.: States have standing to challenge rule they argued requires accommodations for abortions
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—D. Ariz.: Pharmaceutical account managers may move forward with vaccination religious discrimination claim
    • DOJ NEWS—Federal agency ‘determined’ removal restrictions ‘shielding’ ALJs are ‘unconstitutional’
    • EEOC NEWS—Acting Chair restates position on PWFA reg, says she’s waiting for a quorum
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Texas considers sweeping AI legislation: 5 things employers need to know
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—What can happen when federal career employees are told ‘You're fired!’
    • HOUSE NEWS—Rep. Connolly demands clarity on Musk’s position in, authority over DOGE
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Citizen watchdog org sues U.S. DOGE, Musk, and others demanding FOIA records and recordkeeping compliance
    • PROCEDURE—D.D.C.: Unions denied injunctive relief in challenge to federal employee terminations
    • WAGE-HOUR—WORKING TIME—E.D. Pa.: PMWA requires compensation to employees for time spent walking between warehouse entrance and assigned workspaces
    • WAGE-HOUR—WORKING TIME—N.D. Ill.: COVID-19 screenings at hospital may be compensable under FLSA
    • WORTH NOTING—Cases of note dealing with wage and hour issues
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EEOC NEWS—Acting Chair restates position on PWFA reg, says she’s waiting for a quorum, (Feb 21, 2025)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Acting Chair Lucas contends that the final rule issued in April 2014 “fundamentally errs in conflating pregnancy and childbirth accommodation with accommodation of the female sex, that is, female biology and reproduction.”

    In a statement ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Acting Chair Lucas contends that the final rule issued in April 2014 “fundamentally errs in conflating pregnancy and childbirth accommodation with accommodation of the female sex, that is, female biology and reproduction.”

    In a statement issued on the EEOC’s “What You Should Know” page, Acting Chair Andrea Lucas reminds interested parties that she “has been vocal in her opposition to certain parts of the Commission’s Final Rule implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act” and that while she “continues to support” elements of the rule, she did not vote to approve it at the time.

    She states:

    • “The Acting Chair has explained that while she has supported—and continues to support—elements of the Final Rule, ultimately she was unable to vote to approve it because it broadens the scope of the statute in ways that cannot be reconciled with the text. Specifically, the Acting Chair does not agree with the Commission’s interpretation of the phrase “pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions” and the contrivances the Commission used to arrive at its construction of the statute.”

    Citing her statement issued at the time, she reiterates her belief that “at a high level, the rule fundamentally erred in conflating pregnancy and childbirth accommodation with accommodation of the female sex, that is, female biology and reproduction.” She argues that the EEOC “extended the new accommodation requirements to reach virtually every condition, circumstance, or procedure that relates to any aspect of the female reproductive system.”

    Waiting for a quorum. Consistent with her previously stated views, she explains, she “remains opposed to” the construction of the phrase “pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions” used in the Final Rule, but notes that the “Office of the Chair cannot unilaterally rescind or modify this (or any other) Final Rule under the APA, in whole or in part.”

    However, she states that “Once a quorum is re-established at the Commission,” she “intends for the Commission to reconsider portions of the Final Rule that she believes are unsupported by law.”

    News: AgencyNews PregnancyDiscrimination Discrimination FederalRegulations WhiteHouseNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use