Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • LABOR—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES—D. Nev.: Court declines casino’s request for injunction to halt ‘unconstitutional’ NLRB proceedings
    • AGENCY NEWS—EEOC, NLRB, and other agencies announce closure during appropriations lapse
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—E.D. Mich.: Security guard fired for sleeping on duty will get trial on bias claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—M.D. Ga.: Black employee, fired under hair height policy, cannot advance race-based claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—M.D. Pa.: Fired prison employee advances claims of retaliation, discrimination based on sexual orientation
    • DOL NEWS—WHD issues opinion letter on FMLA leave calculations involving voluntary hours, fixed ‘Pitman Schedules,’ and mandatory overtime
    • EEOC NEWS—New suits target bias in hiring and leave, as well as harassment
    • EMPLOYEE LEAVE—E.D.N.Y.: Termination letter, sent to employee at the end of her maternity leave, bolstered FMLA claims
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—California lawmakers send ‘Workplace Know Your Rights Act’ bill to governor
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—What does the government shutdown mean for employers? Answers to your top questions
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—DOL has issued interim final rule relating to methodology for determining the hourly AEWRs for non-range occupations
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Court concludes that EO purporting to eliminate collective bargaining rights of suing federal employees is unlawful as applied
    • VITAL BRIEFING—“No Tax on Overtime” deduction included in new draft form released by IRS, but questions remain about taxpayer eligibility
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, DOL NEWS—WHD issues opinion letter on FMLA leave calculations involving voluntary hours, fixed ‘Pitman Schedules,’ and mandatory overtime, (Oct 2, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Labor and Employment

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    The requestor sought the appropriate method for calculating intermittent or reduced schedule FMLA leave hours when employees work fixed schedules that include mandatory overtime hours and may volunteer for additional hours outside of the published we ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    The requestor sought the appropriate method for calculating intermittent or reduced schedule FMLA leave hours when employees work fixed schedules that include mandatory overtime hours and may volunteer for additional hours outside of the published weekly schedule.

    This week, the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division announced publication of several opinion letters offering official written interpretations from the division. In June, Deputy Secretary of Labor Keith Sonderling announced the launch of the department’s new and improved opinion letter program. These letters were the first posted by WHD since early May. The other letters were covered in yesterday’s Labor and Employment Law Daily publication.

    FMLA leave interpretation. In FMLA2025-02-A, the WHD provided its interpretation of the law as it related to the appropriate method for calculating intermittent or reduced schedule FMLA leave hours when employees work fixed, “Pitman” schedules, requiring 12-hour shifts over a two-week cycle that include mandatory overtime hours, but may also volunteer for additional hours outside of the published weekly schedule.

    In this case, the employer calculates the 12-workweek FMLA leave entitlement as equivalent to 504 hours, the requestor explained, basing this on the number of hours employees are required to work under the employer’s published schedule, which mandates 84 hours of work every two weeks.

    Employer’s calculations deemed correct. WHD responded that, in its opinion, this conversion is in accordance with the FMLA’s requirements, as the calculation is consistent with what would be 12 normally scheduled workweeks for an employee working a mandatory 84 hours every 14 days. “In determining the appropriate amount of an employee’s FMLA leave entitlement,” the letter explained, “an employer may convert the workweek to its hourly equivalent in a manner that equitably reflects the employee’s total normally scheduled hours.” It noted that the “calculation properly appears to take into account normally scheduled hours while disregarding voluntary additional hours that an employee could potentially work.”

    Moreover, the WHD offered its opinion that “when calculating an employee’s FMLA leave usage to be deducted from an employee’s FMLA leave entitlement,” it is “correct to count as FMLA leave any hours the employee would normally work but for the FMLA absence, which includes mandatory overtime hours.” This approach is consistent with regulations “providing that additional voluntary hours that an employee does not work due to an FMLA-qualifying reason are not deducted from the employee’s FMLA leave entitlement.”

    The letter also provided an illustrative example involving a similar set of facts as presented and describing how that employee’s FMLA leave would be calculated.

    News: AgencyNews EmployeeLeave

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use