Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—FedCir: Injunction Against Generic Post-Menopause Osteoporosis Drug Manufacturers Denied
    • COPYRIGHT NEWS: High Court Asked to Review $26 Million Damage Award Against Chinese Company for Foreign Tire Sales
    • COPYRIGHT—DNev: Magician Not Entitled to Anti-Suit Against Dutch Entertainer Who Offered to Sell Magician’s Copyrighted Illusion
    • Copyright—CDCal: Website That Posted Lyrics Without Authorization Ordered to Pay $6.6 Million in Damages
    • PATENT—NDCal: Semiconductor Company Plausibly Alleged Wi-Fi Patent Owners Breached Obligations to License Patents on RAND Terms
    • TRADEMARK NEWS: Supreme Court Asked to Decide Whether Bankruptcy Code Abrogates Trademark Licensee Rights
    • TRADEMARK—EDMo: Proof of Infringement Was Not Required to Show Violation of Consent Judgment Prohibiting Use of “North Face” Marks or Colorable Imitations
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: Refusal to Register Camouflage Design Marks for Navy Clothing and Uniforms Reversed
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, Copyright—CDCal: Website That Posted Lyrics Without Authorization Ordered to Pay $6.6 Million in Damages, (Oct 12, 2012)

    Organizations Mentioned:Moses & Singer, LLP | Nassiri & Jung, LLP

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    A website that published lyrics without permission must pay $6.6 million in damages in light of its willful copyright violations, the federal district court in Los Angeles has held (Peermusic, III, Ltd. V. LiveUniverse, Inc., October 9, 2012, Wu, G.) ...

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    A website that published lyrics without permission must pay $6.6 million in damages in light of its willful copyright violations, the federal district court in Los Angeles has held (Peermusic, III, Ltd. V. LiveUniverse, Inc., October 9, 2012, Wu, G.).

    LiveUniverse, Inc. was held on default judgment to have willfully infringed copyrights in song lyrics held by Peermusic, III, Ltd. The court found the number of copyrighted songs which were infringed was 528.

    In order to set damages, the court requested additional submissions as to the licensing fees which would have been charged had they properly obtained licenses to use the copyrighted lyrics. However, Peermusic did not provide the licensing fee information and argued that the court should not set the amount of statutory damages based upon a relationship to compensatory damages.

    The court noted that it did not intend to set the statutory damages in an amount based simply on the loss of licensing revenues. Rather the court decided that statutory damages based on a single digit multiple of lost licensing revenues was a good starting point for calculating statutory damages. The statutory maximum in this case was $150,000 per song and Peermusic sought $100,000 per song.

    Peermusic was awarded statutory damages in the sum of $12,500 per each of the 528 songs shown to be infringed for a total of $6,600,000 by the court. The award was reasonable in light of the evidence that LiveUniverse’s revenues were not generated solely from the unauthorized lyrics. The court balanced LiveUniverse’s willful violations and multiple contempt orders issued against it with the other evidence to avoid a ridiculously disproportionate award.

    No. CV 09-6160-GW (PLAx).

    Kandis M Koustenis (Moses and Singer LLP) Peermusic, III, Ltd. Andrew R Kislik (Nassiri and Jung LLP) for LiveUniverse, Inc.

    Cases: Copyright CaliforniaNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use