Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—USSCt: High Court Rejects State Action Immunity for Georgia Hospital Merger in FTC Action
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Rejection of Bar Patron’s Antitrust, RICO Claims Against Bars and Restaurants for Ending Happy Hour Promotions Stands
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Title Insurance Purchasers Denied Supreme Court Review of Filed Rate Doctrine in Rate Fixing Suit
    • ANTITRUST—EDCal: U.S. Steel, Related Entities Did Not Engage in Unlawful Allocation of Tin Mill Products Market
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Robocaller Settles FTC Charges
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—SDFla: Rule 9(b) Did Not Apply to FTC Act Claims Against Participant in Alleged Investment Scam
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS: Donut Shop Area Developer Denied Supreme Court Review of Decision Based on Judicial Admission
    • PRIVACY—WDWash: Arbitration Clause Held Unconscionable, Subscriber May Not Be Compelled to Arbitrate TCPA Claims Against Comcast
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—3rdCir: Consumer’s Claim against Disability Insurer Barred by Economic Loss Doctrine
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Robocaller Settles FTC Charges, (Feb 19, 2013)

    By Tobias J. Gillett, J.D., LLM.

    A telemarketer who allegedly peddled credit card interest rate reduction services, extended automobile warranties, and home security systems through illegal robocalls has reached a settlement with the FTC under which he will no longer be permitted to ...

    By Tobias J. Gillett, J.D., LLM.

    A telemarketer who allegedly peddled credit card interest rate reduction services, extended automobile warranties, and home security systems through illegal robocalls has reached a settlement with the FTC under which he will no longer be permitted to engage in telemarketing, the FTC has announced (U.S. v. Cox, FTC File No. 092 3193, Case No. 8:11-cv-01910-DOC-JPR).

    The FTC’s complaint had charged the telemarketer, Roy M. Cox, Jr., and related American, Panamanian, Argentinian, and Hungarian companies with violations of the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), issued pursuant to the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act. The complaint alleged that Cox and his companies had called consumers listed on the Do Not Call Registry and had failed to transmit the name of the telemarketer or seller in violation of the TSR, instead using generic names such as “Card Services,” “Credit Services,” or “Private Office.” Moreover, Cox had allegedly assisted or supported others while knowing, or consciously avoiding knowing, that they were engaged in violations of the TSR.

    The settlement order permanently enjoins Cox from telemarketing and from assisting others in telemarketing. It also imposes a judgment of over $1.125 million, but with payment suspended due to Cox’s inability to pay. Should the financial information he provided to the FTC later prove to be false, the entire amount of the judgment will become due.

    News: ConsumerProtection FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use